Active Users:177 Time:02/06/2024 06:46:07 AM
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM
I mean, seriously, who else should it refer to? Semirhage didn't kill anyone (okay, anyone important...) shortly before getting balefired.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1591 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 575 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 624 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 306 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 550 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 582 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 693 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 631 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 594 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 507 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 486 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 513 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 516 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 520 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 470 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 550 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 506 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 517 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 489 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 471 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 533 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 502 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 515 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 597 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 569 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 546 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 432 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 511 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 563 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 430 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 420 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 474 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 517 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 278 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 559 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 261 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 447 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 492 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 252 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 497 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 431 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 521 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 473 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 471 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 231 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 210 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 475 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 472 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 431 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 462 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 253 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 443 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 206 Views

Reply to Message