Active Users:589 Time:03/05/2026 06:02:28 PM
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM
Yes, if she was balefired she certainly couldn't reveal herself as the killer. But that's not to say some other POV couldn't reveal Graendal as the killer or someone else entirely for that matter.

Your logic is correct if A) Graendal is dead and B) The identity of the killer wasn't revealed to someone else by the killer.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1987 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 923 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 977 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 482 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 968 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 982 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1030 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1006 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 945 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 849 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 824 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 863 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 859 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 858 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 803 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 899 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 851 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 880 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 864 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 828 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 869 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 870 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 887 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 953 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 929 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 883 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 821 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 892 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 925 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 796 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 766 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 826 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 881 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 440 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 812 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 920 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 426 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 795 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 855 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 426 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 875 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 792 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 857 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 827 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 842 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 405 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 362 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 844 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 850 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 786 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 827 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 430 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 816 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 391 Views

Reply to Message