Active Users:956 Time:06/08/2026 08:10:11 PM
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM
If Graendal died - and IMO there are no convincing reasons to believe otherwise - she wasn't Asmo's killer.

But the simply reason is then, that Graendal certainly won't have another PoV, and it makes not much sense to let another character than the killer reveal who murdered Asmo. Also RJ said in an interview that, if he will reveal it in the books, the killer will probably think about killing Asmo in the own PoV. This simply makes the most sense to create a powerful revelation scene to the most discussed mystery in the whole series. I see no reason why BS should do it in the less probable way. Since Graendal had the chance to reveal it in her last PoV in TGS (and in her several poV before..), but didn't do it, it follows that she most likely wasn't the killer (of course, the Graendaldunnit theory was anyway always very tenuous, if you really look into the mystery of Asmo's death).

Graendal might have sent Slayer, though (she or Lanfear, most likely).


How much stock do you put in RJ's musing during an interview about what he would "probably" do? It's not like he left notes for the next author that declare "Asmo's killer must think about the murder in their own POV". What you're talking about is Jordan's original intention of what he might do.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2054 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 994 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1042 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 520 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1039 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1042 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1092 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1068 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1007 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 916 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 874 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 933 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 923 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 925 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 873 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 953 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 902 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 945 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 925 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 896 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 939 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 939 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 956 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1037 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1012 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 945 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 887 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 956 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 990 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 857 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 831 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 884 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 942 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 472 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 980 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 462 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 856 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 913 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 462 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 943 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 863 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 918 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 890 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 910 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 436 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 395 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 915 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 905 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 845 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 893 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 462 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 870 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 429 Views

Reply to Message