Active Users:684 Time:19/03/2026 01:24:31 PM
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
You're assuming two things.

First, that Graendal is in fact dead. She probably is, sure, but this is NOT proven.

Second, that the only people who know the identity of Asmodean's killer are Asmodean himself and the killer. Why can't someone else know? Couldn't we get it from some other POV?

All Sanderson is saying is that IF Graedal were the killer, she can't be balefired so far back that it would bring Asmodean back.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1947 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 882 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 950 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 468 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 937 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 936 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1003 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 980 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 913 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 818 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 798 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 831 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 828 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 826 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 766 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 860 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 823 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 853 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 826 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 799 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 832 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 839 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 862 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 919 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 891 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 852 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 790 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 855 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 898 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 762 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 730 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 787 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 842 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 431 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 885 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 413 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 763 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 822 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 414 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 841 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 749 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 830 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 796 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 809 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 389 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 349 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 813 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 816 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 751 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 794 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 418 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 777 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 376 Views

Reply to Message