Active Users:735 Time:16/09/2026 08:56:19 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
The problem with that... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 16/11/2009 05:11:16 PM
You say faction A makes Gateways into location X. Opposing faction B senses the channeling at X and Travels there to prevent the Gateways from opening.

Now, here's the first issue... What if faction A opens and Gateway and immediately sends in 5 channelers? These channelers can then block the defenders from B opening gateways at X. Meanwhile, soldiers are pouring through...

This does not match at all with the way Jordan described the dynamics of Traveling behind enemy lines.

More importantly, why would he say "ways to interfere with the forming of Gateways", if all he means is weave slicing? Why not say that?
Reply to message
How to disrupt gateways that are made into a battle zone... Shannow - 16/11/2009 08:48:36 AM 1041 Views
there could be other defensive methods as well redhand - 16/11/2009 09:06:56 AM 758 Views
Excellent suggestions... Shannow - 16/11/2009 09:08:59 AM 783 Views
That depends on whether moving gateways are possible. rAndy aL - 19/11/2009 02:01:40 AM 691 Views
I might as well present my argument in full Sidious - 16/11/2009 09:52:34 AM 870 Views
Both options can be valid, but here's why you MUST have the ward... Shannow - 16/11/2009 10:10:55 AM 1015 Views
Re: Both options can be valid, but here's why you MUST have the ward... Watcher - 16/11/2009 12:08:30 PM 748 Views
Another idea Ryan - 16/11/2009 02:59:39 PM 809 Views
You're talking about manipulating the Pattern? Kronin al'Sulc - 17/11/2009 01:54:32 PM 669 Views
The problem with that... fionwe1987 - 16/11/2009 05:11:16 PM 700 Views
Peter Hamilton's "Pandora Star" Meldorian - 16/11/2009 03:36:39 PM 897 Views
I think there's some evidence in favor of the wards idea you are all missing. Logain - 16/11/2009 05:29:22 PM 724 Views
I disagree Jim - 16/11/2009 07:15:53 PM 708 Views
Except Logain - 16/11/2009 07:24:56 PM 692 Views
there's no indication that the gateway isn't almost on top of a city Jim - 17/11/2009 03:09:31 AM 649 Views
It's definitely possible that there can be a ward to detect a gateway opening. Kronin al'Sulc - 17/11/2009 03:22:33 PM 692 Views
How bout a compromise? Gher - 16/11/2009 06:37:40 PM 738 Views
We know that, for e.g., Sammael could detect the location of a Gateway Marshall - 16/11/2009 08:21:57 PM 670 Views
Ahh, I see that Sidious has already suggested this. *NM* Marshall - 16/11/2009 08:30:55 PM 294 Views
i think an automatic weave would be too complicated to cover any reasonable area. Onarishma - 17/11/2009 06:06:54 AM 675 Views
Re: i think an automatic weave would be too complicated to cover any reasonable area. Watcher - 17/11/2009 12:53:19 PM 669 Views
I don't think you need to travel to the Gateway to disrupt it if the ward notifies you of location Onarishma - 17/11/2009 10:57:06 PM 702 Views
I believe that you cannot make a ward completely preventing Traveling. Kronin al'Sulc - 17/11/2009 01:52:24 PM 641 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes