Active Users:2863 Time:03/05/2026 12:24:03 PM
I don't think you need to travel to the Gateway to disrupt it if the ward notifies you of location Onarishma Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 10:57:06 PM
I think there was one scene where one of the forsaken travelled to see Grandal but before they stepped out a small opening appeared first and a chime rang out, effectivly a door bell and Grandal commented on something like someone has remembered their mannors from the AOL.

Personally I's with the idea of ward the area and have teams ready to try to disrupt the gateway forming and if that fails attack the opening but if you are worried how your own people come in there are two solutions. First have designated areas that gateways can open without someone automatically trying to disrupt them This would be a OP version of having one public access door into a high security building.

Option 2 is to employ the door bell gateway to send in a recognition code. Perhaps if its a very secure area combine the two, you can only travel to x room and even then you better have your code sent through before you open a full gateway.


I don't argue with the two different methods suggested for the two different possibilities. Monitoring ward or automatic disruption ward. i just think the automatic disruption ward is impossible at least for use by the majority of strongholds. maybe at thr most significant location where you would be keeping Callandor or a similar level angreal.
Reply to message
How to disrupt gateways that are made into a battle zone... - 16/11/2009 08:48:36 AM 989 Views
there could be other defensive methods as well - 16/11/2009 09:06:56 AM 695 Views
Excellent suggestions... - 16/11/2009 09:08:59 AM 718 Views
That depends on whether moving gateways are possible. - 19/11/2009 02:01:40 AM 619 Views
I might as well present my argument in full - 16/11/2009 09:52:34 AM 813 Views
Both options can be valid, but here's why you MUST have the ward... - 16/11/2009 10:10:55 AM 956 Views
Re: Both options can be valid, but here's why you MUST have the ward... - 16/11/2009 12:08:30 PM 696 Views
Another idea - 16/11/2009 02:59:39 PM 735 Views
You're talking about manipulating the Pattern? - 17/11/2009 01:54:32 PM 606 Views
The problem with that... - 16/11/2009 05:11:16 PM 624 Views
Peter Hamilton's "Pandora Star" - 16/11/2009 03:36:39 PM 792 Views
I think there's some evidence in favor of the wards idea you are all missing. - 16/11/2009 05:29:22 PM 664 Views
I disagree - 16/11/2009 07:15:53 PM 637 Views
Except - 16/11/2009 07:24:56 PM 627 Views
It's definitely possible that there can be a ward to detect a gateway opening. - 17/11/2009 03:22:33 PM 624 Views
How bout a compromise? - 16/11/2009 06:37:40 PM 682 Views
We know that, for e.g., Sammael could detect the location of a Gateway - 16/11/2009 08:21:57 PM 603 Views
Ahh, I see that Sidious has already suggested this. *NM* - 16/11/2009 08:30:55 PM 262 Views
i think an automatic weave would be too complicated to cover any reasonable area. - 17/11/2009 06:06:54 AM 620 Views
Re: i think an automatic weave would be too complicated to cover any reasonable area. - 17/11/2009 12:53:19 PM 596 Views
I don't think you need to travel to the Gateway to disrupt it if the ward notifies you of location - 17/11/2009 10:57:06 PM 648 Views
I believe that you cannot make a ward completely preventing Traveling. - 17/11/2009 01:52:24 PM 579 Views

Reply to Message