Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true.
urizen Send a noteboard - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM
Yes, Hawkwing included AS but he ran a meritocracy(Sp?). He didn't use them because they were AS but rather because they happened to be competent.
Also, It wasn't all Ishy that turned Hawkwing against the AS. The fact that the AS started to sabotage Hawkwing's rule by taking orders from Beonwhin(Sp?) rather than following the laws and guidelines from Hawking, whom as govenors they were to supposed to follow.
Also, It wasn't all Ishy that turned Hawkwing against the AS. The fact that the AS started to sabotage Hawkwing's rule by taking orders from Beonwhin(Sp?) rather than following the laws and guidelines from Hawking, whom as govenors they were to supposed to follow.
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts.....
- 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM
1448 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM
831 Views
- 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM
1448 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM*
- 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM
500 Views
Cadsuane hasn't done anything and Moiraine.....you mean that person from 7 books ago?
- 17/11/2009 05:51:16 AM
801 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM*
- 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM
372 Views
What use have the Andorans been then? As a nation, not individuals. *NM*
- 17/11/2009 06:53:35 AM
406 Views
Not much - of all plots in WOT I wish Daughter Heir had meant Heir, not Daughter of the Heir *NM*
- 18/11/2009 08:54:18 AM
379 Views
Short answer: nope.
- 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM
983 Views
Good answer.....so why are so many stories devoted to those that are only indirectly.....
- 17/11/2009 05:54:10 AM
770 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree.
- 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM
796 Views
rather..
- 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM
906 Views
I think those critiques are overblown and not based on a fair analaysis of WoT History
- 18/11/2009 03:15:12 PM
876 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true.
- 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM
824 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true.
- 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM
809 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine
- 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM
757 Views
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims
- 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM
2191 Views
Re: AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims
- 17/11/2009 12:44:35 PM
1540 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts.....
- 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM
828 Views
- 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM
828 Views
Always help or contribute.....never do or lead.....
- 17/11/2009 04:23:04 PM
739 Views
if that internal silliness is not resolved the power of a united front will remain compromised. *NM*
- 17/11/2009 11:11:54 PM
422 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group
- 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM
777 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM*
- 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM
442 Views
Scored using your words
- 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM
884 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken.....
- 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM
757 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM*
- 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM
484 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody.....
- 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM
790 Views
They reduced her in power.
- 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM
693 Views
Perhaps 1/32th of a point.....she's still almost as powerful as any other woman.....
- 19/11/2009 01:00:26 AM
776 Views
Have you read the books?
- 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM
714 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken.....
- 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM
707 Views
Oh dear!
- 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM
673 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death.....
- 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM
647 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death.....
- 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM
843 Views
This is silly
- 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM
708 Views
There is no misrepresentation
- 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM
709 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation
- 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM
826 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM
831 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously?
- 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM
687 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM*
- 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM
334 Views
It's kind of amusing to see the prima donas bow and scrape before each other while the world ends.
- 19/11/2009 01:37:42 PM
708 Views
