Active Users:2012 Time:17/06/2026 11:24:14 PM
This is silly guttering flame Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM
why are you deliberately misrepresenting him in your arguments and instead hang your arguments on definitions?

Be satisfied with saying that those forsaken got timeouts from the story and often got demoted as well when they returned.

People reborn the ordinary way need 16 years to reenter the game, by which time they would become irrelevancies since this fight is going to be decided in the next few months.

When you start using words from our world for things that are just different you get contradictions. Better to coin a new term that really means what it means.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1491 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1067 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 519 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 395 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 1031 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 839 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 952 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 873 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 856 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 811 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 888 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 845 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 789 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 872 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 773 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 1030 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 835 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 823 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 465 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 937 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 815 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 378 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 506 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 839 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 749 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 760 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 729 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 765 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 763 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 843 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 733 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 702 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 898 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 767 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 746 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 739 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 959 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 812 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 866 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 811 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 785 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 913 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 1013 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 709 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 783 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 767 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 882 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 741 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 358 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 767 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 718 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 799 Views

Reply to Message