Active Users:2132 Time:17/06/2026 11:27:31 PM
Are we speaking english? NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM

That death has a different meaning to us then to WoT characters, particularly when it concern the Forsaken reincarnation.


Since our Death definition takes precedence over the definition made by these fictional characters in their fictional world your arguments rest on shaky ground.

This is my point entirely! You CANNOT redifine the words to suit yourself.
Since you want to use WoT as and example I will cite Enyclopedia Wot, considered by many many many people to be an expert resource on all thing WoT. If you look up Aginor, his entry basically ends with his death in EoTW. Yes his DEATH! Osan'gar appears later. He is Aginor's soul reincarnated, but he is NOT Aginor! Aginor is dead! My point is that you can say that Cyndane is Lanfear reincarnated but Lanfear had to die before Cyndane appeared. That means that she was killed.
You can possibly make the argument that the death was not as effective due to the intercedence of the DO (the ultimate deus ex machina) but you cannot say that an AS (Moiraine) neither killed Lanfear or caused her to be killed. To blame the AS for her reincarnation as Cyndane is ignorant and short sighted. Since this ignorance was the main point of the original poster, I called him on it.

NaCl(you can argue all you want but the AS killed 3 Forsaken, the fact that they came back doesn't mean they weren't killed)H2O +<img class=' />
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 19/11/2009 at 08:09:30 PM
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1492 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1068 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 520 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 396 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 1032 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 840 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 953 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 874 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 857 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 811 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 889 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 846 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 790 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 872 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 774 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 1030 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 836 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 824 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 466 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 938 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 816 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 379 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 507 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 840 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 750 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 761 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 730 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 766 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 764 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 844 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 733 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 703 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 899 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 767 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 747 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 740 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 960 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 813 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 867 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 812 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 786 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 914 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 1013 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 710 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 784 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 768 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 883 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 742 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 359 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 768 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 719 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 799 Views

Reply to Message