Active Users:360 Time:02/07/2025 05:31:05 AM
Not really BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM
That death has a different meaning to us then to WoT characters, particularly when it concern the Forsaken reincarnation.

Since our Death definition takes precedence over the definition made by these fictional characters in their fictional world your arguments rest on shaky ground.


I think most Randlanders would agree with our definition. No one think that when they pass away or get killed in battle, that that is somehow not dying/not death.

Just because they believe in reincarnation doesn't mean they have a different criteria for death.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1356 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 924 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 459 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 329 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 874 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 697 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 813 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 720 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 708 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 639 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 743 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 689 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 643 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 710 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 632 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 890 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 701 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 665 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 402 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 800 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 647 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 319 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 421 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 676 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 600 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 628 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 578 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 619 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 625 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 663 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 587 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 553 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 749 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 592 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 609 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 594 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 805 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 680 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 731 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 667 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 640 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 768 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 874 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 569 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 641 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 622 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 739 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 589 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 294 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 614 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 575 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 674 Views

Reply to Message