Active Users:655 Time:02/02/2026 02:18:04 AM
Are we speaking english? NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM

That death has a different meaning to us then to WoT characters, particularly when it concern the Forsaken reincarnation.


Since our Death definition takes precedence over the definition made by these fictional characters in their fictional world your arguments rest on shaky ground.

This is my point entirely! You CANNOT redifine the words to suit yourself.
Since you want to use WoT as and example I will cite Enyclopedia Wot, considered by many many many people to be an expert resource on all thing WoT. If you look up Aginor, his entry basically ends with his death in EoTW. Yes his DEATH! Osan'gar appears later. He is Aginor's soul reincarnated, but he is NOT Aginor! Aginor is dead! My point is that you can say that Cyndane is Lanfear reincarnated but Lanfear had to die before Cyndane appeared. That means that she was killed.
You can possibly make the argument that the death was not as effective due to the intercedence of the DO (the ultimate deus ex machina) but you cannot say that an AS (Moiraine) neither killed Lanfear or caused her to be killed. To blame the AS for her reincarnation as Cyndane is ignorant and short sighted. Since this ignorance was the main point of the original poster, I called him on it.

NaCl(you can argue all you want but the AS killed 3 Forsaken, the fact that they came back doesn't mean they weren't killed)H2O +<img class=' />
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 19/11/2009 at 08:09:30 PM
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1428 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1008 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 494 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 366 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 954 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 775 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 882 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 803 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 787 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 732 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 815 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 767 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 718 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 803 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 710 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 961 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 768 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 754 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 438 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 868 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 730 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 352 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 476 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 767 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 677 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 700 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 647 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 696 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 689 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 761 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 655 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 624 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 826 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 683 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 688 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 675 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 885 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 748 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 809 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 743 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 717 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 849 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 950 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 641 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 713 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 698 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 813 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 665 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 329 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 687 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 647 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 740 Views

Reply to Message