That death has a different meaning to us then to WoT characters, particularly when it concern the Forsaken reincarnation.
Since our Death definition takes precedence over the definition made by these fictional characters in their fictional world your arguments rest on shaky ground.
Since our Death definition takes precedence over the definition made by these fictional characters in their fictional world your arguments rest on shaky ground.
I think most Randlanders would agree with our definition. No one think that when they pass away or get killed in battle, that that is somehow not dying/not death.
Just because they believe in reincarnation doesn't mean they have a different criteria for death.
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts.....
- 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM
1393 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM
780 Views
- 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM
1393 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM*
- 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM
478 Views
Cadsuane hasn't done anything and Moiraine.....you mean that person from 7 books ago?
- 17/11/2009 05:51:16 AM
735 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM*
- 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM
349 Views
What use have the Andorans been then? As a nation, not individuals. *NM*
- 17/11/2009 06:53:35 AM
368 Views
Not much - of all plots in WOT I wish Daughter Heir had meant Heir, not Daughter of the Heir *NM*
- 18/11/2009 08:54:18 AM
354 Views
Short answer: nope.
- 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM
917 Views
Good answer.....so why are so many stories devoted to those that are only indirectly.....
- 17/11/2009 05:54:10 AM
717 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree.
- 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM
739 Views
rather..
- 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM
849 Views
I think those critiques are overblown and not based on a fair analaysis of WoT History
- 18/11/2009 03:15:12 PM
819 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true.
- 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM
763 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true.
- 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM
746 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine
- 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM
686 Views
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims
- 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM
2125 Views
Re: AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims
- 17/11/2009 12:44:35 PM
1491 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts.....
- 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM
757 Views
- 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM
757 Views
Always help or contribute.....never do or lead.....
- 17/11/2009 04:23:04 PM
689 Views
if that internal silliness is not resolved the power of a united front will remain compromised. *NM*
- 17/11/2009 11:11:54 PM
402 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group
- 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM
715 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM*
- 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM
421 Views
Scored using your words
- 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM
840 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken.....
- 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM
685 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM*
- 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM
457 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody.....
- 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM
717 Views
They reduced her in power.
- 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM
643 Views
Perhaps 1/32th of a point.....she's still almost as powerful as any other woman.....
- 19/11/2009 01:00:26 AM
722 Views
Have you read the books?
- 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM
664 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken.....
- 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM
664 Views
Oh dear!
- 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM
624 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death.....
- 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM
590 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death.....
- 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM
790 Views
This is silly
- 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM
633 Views
There is no misrepresentation
- 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM
654 Views
The point I made is
- 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM
641 Views
Not really
- 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM
719 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation
- 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM
765 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM
780 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously?
- 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM
626 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM*
- 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM
313 Views
It's kind of amusing to see the prima donas bow and scrape before each other while the world ends.
- 19/11/2009 01:37:42 PM
660 Views
