Active Users:491 Time:03/05/2025 04:39:28 AM
On that note, what was the point of Graendal's angreal? Shannow Send a noteboard - 30/11/2009 10:07:41 PM
If Graendal is dead, then her aquisition of the ring angreal has served no puspose in terms of the plot. She hasn't killed one enemy who 'thought they knew her strength', before being unpleasantly surprised.

The scuffle with Cyndane and Moghedien was meaningless from a plot perspective since they never intended to kill her in any case.

Come to think of it, could the unfillfilled use of her angreal be a sign that she is actually still alive? Was her thought about surprising someone with it foreshadowing by RJ, or just a meaningless soundbyte?
This message last edited by Shannow on 30/11/2009 at 10:38:04 PM
Reply to message
The loss of angreal - 30/11/2009 08:22:38 PM 1592 Views
Moiraine's return may sort out 2, 5 and 6 *NM* - 30/11/2009 08:51:00 PM 545 Views
The Eelfinn probably took their angreal - 30/11/2009 09:00:16 PM 891 Views
sure who needs them anyway, the good guys are goin to win regardless *NM* - 30/11/2009 09:41:13 PM 382 Views
Basically! The only question is how? - 30/11/2009 10:00:15 PM 1041 Views
Lanfear's angreal is not with the Finns - 01/12/2009 04:29:17 AM 1041 Views
I'm not sure - 01/12/2009 07:11:26 AM 766 Views
she didn't drop it. Mo was clawing it away as they tumbled through. - 01/12/2009 08:59:46 AM 822 Views
Verin went to the Tower storerooms looking for the Oath Rod. - 30/11/2009 10:03:27 PM 939 Views
I don't think her angreal belonged to the Tower - 01/12/2009 04:30:46 AM 841 Views
I really miss the reference desk - 01/12/2009 06:01:55 AM 910 Views
It's mentioned twice in Deceptive Appearances - 01/12/2009 06:23:27 AM 910 Views
I meant it's not mentioned where/how she got it . - 01/12/2009 06:53:17 AM 781 Views
Aahhh.... - 01/12/2009 08:16:15 AM 884 Views
Isn't it in the Tower Law that all angreal belong to the Tower? - 06/08/2010 04:47:07 PM 767 Views
On that note, what was the point of Graendal's angreal? - 30/11/2009 10:07:41 PM 915 Views
Just another false lead - 30/11/2009 11:59:42 PM 774 Views
Maybe not... she used it to repel Verin's shield - 14/12/2009 01:14:05 PM 910 Views
It was probably just fun information - 01/12/2009 04:32:00 AM 778 Views
Bel'al & the famous Tear collection - 06/08/2010 05:01:03 PM 873 Views
Probably she just got it... - 01/12/2009 12:22:57 PM 826 Views
Dead or not I thin BS has made it clear she'll be in ToM - 01/12/2009 07:07:10 PM 812 Views
Moridin offered her #2 because... - 01/12/2009 11:52:34 PM 1013 Views
Sorry, I meant what was the plot point of bringing it up only to have her die off b4 it matters! - 02/12/2009 07:17:04 PM 991 Views
The same as Shai'tan promising every Forsaken to be Nae'blis. - 02/12/2009 07:59:39 PM 734 Views
Par for the course - 03/12/2009 01:22:38 AM 1080 Views
I wonder why Verin... - 30/11/2009 10:23:01 PM 919 Views
I think Fanatic Templar is right. - 30/11/2009 11:24:31 PM 992 Views
She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 01/12/2009 02:27:32 AM 820 Views
Re: She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 02/12/2009 12:47:51 AM 897 Views
Moraine had an Angreal? The only one I recall her having she returned in book 2. *NM* - 30/11/2009 11:25:07 PM 469 Views
Did she return it? I can't recall. *NM* - 01/12/2009 04:32:50 AM 390 Views
It's been a few years since I read the earlier volumes. *NM* - 02/12/2009 02:03:36 AM 399 Views
She never returned it - 01/12/2009 06:00:33 AM 765 Views
Meaning What, Exactly? - 01/12/2009 11:35:43 AM 960 Views
Well thank god Elayne will learn to make them - 01/12/2009 07:02:48 PM 837 Views
Ha, maybe that's why they're rare. - 01/12/2009 07:38:46 PM 953 Views
Re: Female CK - 14/12/2009 01:13:55 PM 928 Views
The female Choedan Kal was destroyed as well - 14/12/2009 02:37:53 PM 957 Views

Reply to Message