Active Users:1242 Time:04/05/2026 03:53:00 AM
On that note, what was the point of Graendal's angreal? Shannow Send a noteboard - 30/11/2009 10:07:41 PM
If Graendal is dead, then her aquisition of the ring angreal has served no puspose in terms of the plot. She hasn't killed one enemy who 'thought they knew her strength', before being unpleasantly surprised.

The scuffle with Cyndane and Moghedien was meaningless from a plot perspective since they never intended to kill her in any case.

Come to think of it, could the unfillfilled use of her angreal be a sign that she is actually still alive? Was her thought about surprising someone with it foreshadowing by RJ, or just a meaningless soundbyte?
This message last edited by Shannow on 30/11/2009 at 10:38:04 PM
Reply to message
The loss of angreal - 30/11/2009 08:22:38 PM 1822 Views
Moiraine's return may sort out 2, 5 and 6 *NM* - 30/11/2009 08:51:00 PM 637 Views
The Eelfinn probably took their angreal - 30/11/2009 09:00:16 PM 1146 Views
sure who needs them anyway, the good guys are goin to win regardless *NM* - 30/11/2009 09:41:13 PM 461 Views
Basically! The only question is how? - 30/11/2009 10:00:15 PM 1255 Views
Lanfear's angreal is not with the Finns - 01/12/2009 04:29:17 AM 1231 Views
I'm not sure - 01/12/2009 07:11:26 AM 964 Views
she didn't drop it. Mo was clawing it away as they tumbled through. - 01/12/2009 08:59:46 AM 1018 Views
Verin went to the Tower storerooms looking for the Oath Rod. - 30/11/2009 10:03:27 PM 1156 Views
I don't think her angreal belonged to the Tower - 01/12/2009 04:30:46 AM 1071 Views
I really miss the reference desk - 01/12/2009 06:01:55 AM 1132 Views
It's mentioned twice in Deceptive Appearances - 01/12/2009 06:23:27 AM 1139 Views
I meant it's not mentioned where/how she got it . - 01/12/2009 06:53:17 AM 1011 Views
Aahhh.... - 01/12/2009 08:16:15 AM 1074 Views
Isn't it in the Tower Law that all angreal belong to the Tower? - 06/08/2010 04:47:07 PM 950 Views
On that note, what was the point of Graendal's angreal? - 30/11/2009 10:07:41 PM 1106 Views
Just another false lead - 30/11/2009 11:59:42 PM 1018 Views
Maybe not... she used it to repel Verin's shield - 14/12/2009 01:14:05 PM 1112 Views
It was probably just fun information - 01/12/2009 04:32:00 AM 970 Views
Bel'al & the famous Tear collection - 06/08/2010 05:01:03 PM 1056 Views
Probably she just got it... - 01/12/2009 12:22:57 PM 1042 Views
Dead or not I thin BS has made it clear she'll be in ToM - 01/12/2009 07:07:10 PM 1012 Views
Moridin offered her #2 because... - 01/12/2009 11:52:34 PM 1213 Views
Sorry, I meant what was the plot point of bringing it up only to have her die off b4 it matters! - 02/12/2009 07:17:04 PM 1198 Views
The same as Shai'tan promising every Forsaken to be Nae'blis. - 02/12/2009 07:59:39 PM 990 Views
Par for the course - 03/12/2009 01:22:38 AM 1335 Views
I wonder why Verin... - 30/11/2009 10:23:01 PM 1135 Views
I think Fanatic Templar is right. - 30/11/2009 11:24:31 PM 1210 Views
She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 01/12/2009 02:27:32 AM 1009 Views
Re: She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 02/12/2009 12:47:51 AM 1084 Views
Moraine had an Angreal? The only one I recall her having she returned in book 2. *NM* - 30/11/2009 11:25:07 PM 558 Views
Did she return it? I can't recall. *NM* - 01/12/2009 04:32:50 AM 489 Views
It's been a few years since I read the earlier volumes. *NM* - 02/12/2009 02:03:36 AM 505 Views
She never returned it - 01/12/2009 06:00:33 AM 957 Views
Meaning What, Exactly? - 01/12/2009 11:35:43 AM 1222 Views
Well thank god Elayne will learn to make them - 01/12/2009 07:02:48 PM 1048 Views
Ha, maybe that's why they're rare. - 01/12/2009 07:38:46 PM 1161 Views
Re: Female CK - 14/12/2009 01:13:55 PM 1133 Views
The female Choedan Kal was destroyed as well - 14/12/2009 02:37:53 PM 1172 Views

Reply to Message