Active Users:351 Time:17/06/2025 07:07:41 PM
did the male choedan kal get destroyed or did rand just destroy the access key ter'angreal? *NM* moondog Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 01:24:38 AM

We're losing angreal and sa'angreal in this series. Very soon they'll all be gone. Destroyed angreal/sa'angreal...

1. The Choedan Kal (both)
2. Rand's fat man angreal (missing, probably forever)
3. Graendal's pinky ring (along with Graendal)
4. Verin's angreal (probably to the grave with Verin)
5. Moiraine's angreal (missing)
6. Lanfear's angreal (missing)

:)
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
The loss of angreal - 30/11/2009 08:22:38 PM 1608 Views
Moiraine's return may sort out 2, 5 and 6 *NM* - 30/11/2009 08:51:00 PM 551 Views
The Eelfinn probably took their angreal - 30/11/2009 09:00:16 PM 934 Views
sure who needs them anyway, the good guys are goin to win regardless *NM* - 30/11/2009 09:41:13 PM 389 Views
Basically! The only question is how? - 30/11/2009 10:00:15 PM 1056 Views
Lanfear's angreal is not with the Finns - 01/12/2009 04:29:17 AM 1054 Views
I'm not sure - 01/12/2009 07:11:26 AM 781 Views
she didn't drop it. Mo was clawing it away as they tumbled through. - 01/12/2009 08:59:46 AM 837 Views
Verin went to the Tower storerooms looking for the Oath Rod. - 30/11/2009 10:03:27 PM 952 Views
I don't think her angreal belonged to the Tower - 01/12/2009 04:30:46 AM 856 Views
I really miss the reference desk - 01/12/2009 06:01:55 AM 924 Views
It's mentioned twice in Deceptive Appearances - 01/12/2009 06:23:27 AM 923 Views
I meant it's not mentioned where/how she got it . - 01/12/2009 06:53:17 AM 791 Views
Aahhh.... - 01/12/2009 08:16:15 AM 896 Views
Isn't it in the Tower Law that all angreal belong to the Tower? - 06/08/2010 04:47:07 PM 778 Views
On that note, what was the point of Graendal's angreal? - 30/11/2009 10:07:41 PM 931 Views
Just another false lead - 30/11/2009 11:59:42 PM 786 Views
Maybe not... she used it to repel Verin's shield - 14/12/2009 01:14:05 PM 930 Views
It was probably just fun information - 01/12/2009 04:32:00 AM 794 Views
Bel'al & the famous Tear collection - 06/08/2010 05:01:03 PM 889 Views
Probably she just got it... - 01/12/2009 12:22:57 PM 839 Views
Dead or not I thin BS has made it clear she'll be in ToM - 01/12/2009 07:07:10 PM 829 Views
Moridin offered her #2 because... - 01/12/2009 11:52:34 PM 1024 Views
Sorry, I meant what was the plot point of bringing it up only to have her die off b4 it matters! - 02/12/2009 07:17:04 PM 1008 Views
The same as Shai'tan promising every Forsaken to be Nae'blis. - 02/12/2009 07:59:39 PM 754 Views
Par for the course - 03/12/2009 01:22:38 AM 1095 Views
I wonder why Verin... - 30/11/2009 10:23:01 PM 936 Views
I think Fanatic Templar is right. - 30/11/2009 11:24:31 PM 1010 Views
She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 01/12/2009 02:27:32 AM 835 Views
Re: She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 02/12/2009 12:47:51 AM 909 Views
Moraine had an Angreal? The only one I recall her having she returned in book 2. *NM* - 30/11/2009 11:25:07 PM 474 Views
Did she return it? I can't recall. *NM* - 01/12/2009 04:32:50 AM 398 Views
It's been a few years since I read the earlier volumes. *NM* - 02/12/2009 02:03:36 AM 407 Views
She never returned it - 01/12/2009 06:00:33 AM 778 Views
did the male choedan kal get destroyed or did rand just destroy the access key ter'angreal? *NM* - 01/12/2009 01:24:38 AM 591 Views
Destroyed With the Power, Which I Wouldn't Have Thought Possible. - 01/12/2009 11:47:26 AM 962 Views
Meaning What, Exactly? - 01/12/2009 11:35:43 AM 972 Views
Well thank god Elayne will learn to make them - 01/12/2009 07:02:48 PM 850 Views
Ha, maybe that's why they're rare. - 01/12/2009 07:38:46 PM 966 Views
Re: Female CK - 14/12/2009 01:13:55 PM 944 Views
The female Choedan Kal was destroyed as well - 14/12/2009 02:37:53 PM 977 Views

Reply to Message