Active Users:1997 Time:22/09/2026 09:07:44 AM
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. Tansu Targli Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM
She is one of the "Chosen" Forsaken.
I believe that she is still in the White Tower.

I don't know anything about Mesaana really, but I don't find it out of the realm of possibility that she may have done one of two things.

The First is the one that I find to be most probable; she swore the oaths and then said that she was not Black Ajah. Simple as that.
The reason she would have been able to do this is that even after taking the oaths it is possible to tell a lie. All you have to do is believe it. How else can one group of Aes Sedai claim two different Amyrlins? Mesaana thinks of herself as being ABOVE THE BLACK.

The second way is she could have compelled the sister she was posing as let her do it for her. Whether or not that sister were Black I believe that the compulsion would allow her to say that she wasn't.

But of course I believe that Mesaana took the oaths herself and passed the test because in her mind She Is Not Black Ajah.
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1564 Views
Obviously - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 1089 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 1068 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 407 Views
It might even kill her - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 805 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 406 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 376 Views
I thought... - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 896 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 924 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 881 Views
shaido still have it - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 924 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 998 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 876 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 355 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 804 Views
Ummm, what? - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 786 Views
Re: Ummm, what? - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 773 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 942 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 805 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 363 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 949 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 925 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 815 Views
Turn off the Rod - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 926 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 813 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1365 Views

Reply to Message