Active Users:623 Time:19/03/2026 05:37:08 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM
They do it all the time by parsing meaning and sifting their responses so that they are not technically in breach of any of them. There are enough holes in the Oaths, that the posters above pretty much indicate the various ways she could get around them.

Plus, the easiest thing to do is to have the Oaths removed later on, and replace them with her own (ie: I swear to wear brown silk dresses, I swear to be as circumspect as possible, etc). Perhaps the reason Mesaana was not active at first was because she was locating her own Oath Rod?
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1449 Views
Obviously artois - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 984 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. lord-of-shadow - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 952 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* Lord Haart - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 359 Views
It might even kill her Sidious - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 703 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* Tom - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 355 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 327 Views
I thought... artois - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 798 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 799 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 780 Views
shaido still have it moondog - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 826 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. BlackAdder - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 884 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 775 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* fionwe1987 - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 304 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 701 Views
Ummm, what? fionwe1987 - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 669 Views
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 666 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths. fionwe1987 - 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM 764 Views
Moiraine wasn't worried about getting around the Oaths Sidious - 04/12/2009 04:41:04 AM 701 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS Light in the Night - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 821 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis Ryan - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 692 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 315 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that beetnemesis - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 834 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 815 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. Great Lord of Chaos - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 720 Views
Turn off the Rod balefried - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 830 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? Onarishma - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 701 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is Onarishma - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1275 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes