Active Users:662 Time:26/12/2025 04:04:53 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM
The Oaths are only as useful as the mind they Bind.

The a'dam are actually quite insignificant compared to the Three Oaths.

A mind is more powerful than a tool.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1381 Views
Obviously artois - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 941 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. lord-of-shadow - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 902 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* Lord Haart - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 341 Views
It might even kill her Sidious - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 657 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* Tom - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 336 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 307 Views
I thought... artois - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 753 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 753 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 733 Views
shaido still have it moondog - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 784 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. BlackAdder - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 836 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 684 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* fionwe1987 - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 284 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 658 Views
Ummm, what? fionwe1987 - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 611 Views
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 622 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths. fionwe1987 - 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM 715 Views
Moiraine wasn't worried about getting around the Oaths Sidious - 04/12/2009 04:41:04 AM 660 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS Light in the Night - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 770 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis Ryan - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 642 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 296 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that beetnemesis - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 792 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 773 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. Great Lord of Chaos - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 666 Views
Turn off the Rod balefried - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 781 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? Onarishma - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 639 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is Onarishma - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1233 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes