Active Users:552 Time:19/03/2026 10:27:08 AM
The same as Shai'tan promising every Forsaken to be Nae'blis. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 02/12/2009 07:59:39 PM
What was the point of her random gaining of an angreal?
Did she kill Asmo?
What was the point of her alliance with Aran'gar?
Why ahve Moridin offer her the #2 spot only to have her die without another word?


I can't answer all of these questions, but the reason Moridin offered her a position of power was most likely an incentive to remain in Arad Doman rather than bugging out to a new base of operations which she might have done if left to her own devices (she often spoke of abandoning AD and relocating if Rand came anywhere near her).

It's very possible that Moridin was setting up Graendal as much as Semirhage seems to have been set up, and possibly for the same purpose.

The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
The loss of angreal - 30/11/2009 08:22:38 PM 1785 Views
Moiraine's return may sort out 2, 5 and 6 *NM* - 30/11/2009 08:51:00 PM 624 Views
The Eelfinn probably took their angreal - 30/11/2009 09:00:16 PM 1120 Views
sure who needs them anyway, the good guys are goin to win regardless *NM* - 30/11/2009 09:41:13 PM 450 Views
Basically! The only question is how? - 30/11/2009 10:00:15 PM 1224 Views
Lanfear's angreal is not with the Finns - 01/12/2009 04:29:17 AM 1206 Views
I'm not sure - 01/12/2009 07:11:26 AM 938 Views
she didn't drop it. Mo was clawing it away as they tumbled through. - 01/12/2009 08:59:46 AM 986 Views
Verin went to the Tower storerooms looking for the Oath Rod. - 30/11/2009 10:03:27 PM 1119 Views
I don't think her angreal belonged to the Tower - 01/12/2009 04:30:46 AM 1031 Views
I really miss the reference desk - 01/12/2009 06:01:55 AM 1094 Views
It's mentioned twice in Deceptive Appearances - 01/12/2009 06:23:27 AM 1096 Views
I meant it's not mentioned where/how she got it . - 01/12/2009 06:53:17 AM 971 Views
Aahhh.... - 01/12/2009 08:16:15 AM 1041 Views
Isn't it in the Tower Law that all angreal belong to the Tower? - 06/08/2010 04:47:07 PM 918 Views
On that note, what was the point of Graendal's angreal? - 30/11/2009 10:07:41 PM 1074 Views
Just another false lead - 30/11/2009 11:59:42 PM 988 Views
Maybe not... she used it to repel Verin's shield - 14/12/2009 01:14:05 PM 1084 Views
It was probably just fun information - 01/12/2009 04:32:00 AM 938 Views
Bel'al & the famous Tear collection - 06/08/2010 05:01:03 PM 1026 Views
Probably she just got it... - 01/12/2009 12:22:57 PM 1011 Views
Dead or not I thin BS has made it clear she'll be in ToM - 01/12/2009 07:07:10 PM 981 Views
Moridin offered her #2 because... - 01/12/2009 11:52:34 PM 1184 Views
Sorry, I meant what was the plot point of bringing it up only to have her die off b4 it matters! - 02/12/2009 07:17:04 PM 1167 Views
The same as Shai'tan promising every Forsaken to be Nae'blis. - 02/12/2009 07:59:39 PM 955 Views
Par for the course - 03/12/2009 01:22:38 AM 1287 Views
I wonder why Verin... - 30/11/2009 10:23:01 PM 1103 Views
I think Fanatic Templar is right. - 30/11/2009 11:24:31 PM 1179 Views
She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 01/12/2009 02:27:32 AM 977 Views
Re: She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 02/12/2009 12:47:51 AM 1055 Views
Moraine had an Angreal? The only one I recall her having she returned in book 2. *NM* - 30/11/2009 11:25:07 PM 545 Views
Did she return it? I can't recall. *NM* - 01/12/2009 04:32:50 AM 478 Views
It's been a few years since I read the earlier volumes. *NM* - 02/12/2009 02:03:36 AM 492 Views
She never returned it - 01/12/2009 06:00:33 AM 924 Views
Meaning What, Exactly? - 01/12/2009 11:35:43 AM 1192 Views
Well thank god Elayne will learn to make them - 01/12/2009 07:02:48 PM 1022 Views
Ha, maybe that's why they're rare. - 01/12/2009 07:38:46 PM 1132 Views
Re: Female CK - 14/12/2009 01:13:55 PM 1100 Views
The female Choedan Kal was destroyed as well - 14/12/2009 02:37:53 PM 1143 Views

Reply to Message