Active Users:2664 Time:03/05/2026 12:26:54 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM
Moiraine, for example, felt threatened enough at multiple times due to her mission and the nature of her enemies to have rather free reign in regards to how she approached this Oath - as far as she was concerned, everyone was a potential enemy and noone could be trusted.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1477 Views
Obviously artois - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 1013 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. lord-of-shadow - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 977 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* Lord Haart - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 370 Views
It might even kill her Sidious - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 729 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* Tom - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 369 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 338 Views
I thought... artois - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 830 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 823 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 808 Views
shaido still have it moondog - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 852 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. BlackAdder - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 913 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 800 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* fionwe1987 - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 315 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 727 Views
Ummm, what? fionwe1987 - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 697 Views
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 694 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths. fionwe1987 - 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM 798 Views
Moiraine wasn't worried about getting around the Oaths Sidious - 04/12/2009 04:41:04 AM 727 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS Light in the Night - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 850 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis Ryan - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 723 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 326 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that beetnemesis - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 855 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 849 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. Great Lord of Chaos - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 742 Views
Turn off the Rod balefried - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 854 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? Onarishma - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 730 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is Onarishma - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1298 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes