Active Users:1266 Time:23/10/2025 06:33:42 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM
I cannot remember one instance where Moiraine used the Power on civilians and justified it as self defense.


That's not what I said. At all.

What I said was that Moiraine was prepared to defend herself at any moment, because of her mission. She did not indiscriminately start attacking people because of it, but her life has been in danger more than once, and often not on battlefields. Recall that Lan mentioned carrying her all the way back to the Tower with an arrow in her back, and her doing the same for him. Considering the nature of her mission, I believe they were in situations where anyone and anything could be an enemy.

You'll also recall that when she met Balthamel and Aginor, she didn't wait for them to attack - the fact that they were Forsaken and were in front of her was enough for her to start fighting them with killing weaves.
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1351 Views
Obviously artois - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 913 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. lord-of-shadow - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 878 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* Lord Haart - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 325 Views
It might even kill her Sidious - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 632 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* Tom - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 329 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 292 Views
I thought... artois - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 730 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 725 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 706 Views
shaido still have it moondog - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 754 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. BlackAdder - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 810 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 653 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* fionwe1987 - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 273 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 637 Views
Ummm, what? fionwe1987 - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 589 Views
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 598 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths. fionwe1987 - 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM 694 Views
Moiraine wasn't worried about getting around the Oaths Sidious - 04/12/2009 04:41:04 AM 632 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS Light in the Night - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 748 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis Ryan - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 616 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 286 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that beetnemesis - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 762 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 746 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. Great Lord of Chaos - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 639 Views
Turn off the Rod balefried - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 752 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? Onarishma - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 616 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is Onarishma - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1210 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes