Active Users:301 Time:02/05/2024 07:25:59 AM
OK, but... Shannow Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 05:23:21 AM
Valid as it may be, does an answer like that not point to deficiencies on the side of the author?

It's like saying: 'This part of my plot doesn't make sense but just ignore logic, please, because I couldn't think of another way to make things go the way I want.'
This message last edited by Shannow on 14/12/2009 at 05:25:47 AM
Reply to message
So why didn't Egwene Travel into the Tower storerooms from Salidar and steal the sa'angreal? - 13/12/2009 08:32:01 PM 1298 Views
Plot convenience *NM* - 13/12/2009 08:38:49 PM 330 Views
Regardless of more textual answers, this is the best *NM* - 14/12/2009 01:53:47 AM 273 Views
Agreed - 14/12/2009 04:17:56 AM 664 Views
OK, but... - 14/12/2009 05:23:21 AM 644 Views
Another example I like to cite... - 14/12/2009 12:03:36 PM 663 Views
I think there are dozens of examples - 14/12/2009 03:15:50 PM 578 Views
I don't see that as unbelievable. - 14/12/2009 06:09:44 AM 680 Views
I don't buy it - 14/12/2009 03:19:59 PM 650 Views
Re: I don't buy it - 14/12/2009 03:50:05 PM 606 Views
Re: I don't buy it - 14/12/2009 05:20:04 PM 604 Views
The Heart of the Stone was indeed guarded. - 14/12/2009 09:45:13 PM 555 Views
Re: Demandred, Callandor and the explicit-ness debate - 14/12/2009 01:08:34 PM 642 Views
LT's skills - 16/12/2009 04:55:55 AM 521 Views
Basically. - 14/12/2009 06:17:08 PM 520 Views
Because Egwene did not intend to blast the Tower to bits. - 13/12/2009 09:18:13 PM 713 Views
What darius_sedai said.. - 14/12/2009 11:00:24 AM 607 Views
Re: A few reasons - 14/12/2009 01:45:09 PM 675 Views

Reply to Message