Active Users:355 Time:01/05/2025 04:57:10 AM
So RJ used two separate scales, one actual one relative, to explain the same thing? fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 11:33:20 PM
Bell curves are usually not centered on the mean or median. This is a statistical fact.

In order for a distribution to be a bell curve it is, by definition, centered on its mean.

From The Wikipedia article "Normal distribution"
In probability theory and statistics, the normal distribution or Gaussian distribution is a continuous probability distribution that describes data that cluster around the mean. The graph of the associated probability density function is bell-shaped, with a peak at the mean, and is known as the Gaussian function or bell curve.


I propose that the Bell Curve is cut by zero at around 2 standard deviations below the mean. In other words, while it is a perfect Bell Curve, you'd have to draw the bottom portion of it as an imaginary curve below zero strength.

If not that, then it must be a relative scale, where each movement away from the mean is a proportional one, rather than an absolute one.

Remember, RJ's 21 level scale isn't supposed to be superimposed on the Bell Curve. The Bell Curve is merely another, independent tool to represent the channeling population.
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1435 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 826 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 895 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 421 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 758 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 814 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 904 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 852 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 983 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 813 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 763 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 883 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 951 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 743 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 910 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 929 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 823 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 786 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 807 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 776 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 774 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 781 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 875 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 764 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 768 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 831 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 786 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 1018 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 723 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 805 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 781 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 797 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 792 Views
So RJ used two separate scales, one actual one relative, to explain the same thing? - 18/12/2009 11:33:20 PM 755 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 777 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 865 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 752 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 447 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 1086 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 797 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 390 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 760 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 734 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 937 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 437 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 737 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 893 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 1095 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 773 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 994 Views

Reply to Message