here's what Wikipedia has to say about a Bell Curve
In probability theory and statistics, the normal distribution or Gaussian distribution is a continuous probability distribution that describes data that cluster around the mean. The graph of the associated probability density function is bell-shaped, with a peak at the mean, and is known as the Gaussian function or bell curve.
If you have a better theory put it out there instead of just sitting back telling the rest of us we are stupid... until then
In probability theory and statistics, the normal distribution or Gaussian distribution is a continuous probability distribution that describes data that cluster around the mean. The graph of the associated probability density function is bell-shaped, with a peak at the mean, and is known as the Gaussian function or bell curve.
If you have a better theory put it out there instead of just sitting back telling the rest of us we are stupid... until then

You just don't get it, even when you cut and paste. Note key word in your quote: "describes".
The distribution describes the data.
(The distribution is not the data.)
Refer to the example I gave you earlier on IQs. This is an analogous concept.
You cannot take data from a FREQUENCY distribution and manipulate mathematically. IQ100 +IQ110 does not equal anything!
The FREQUENCY distribution is for prediction, validation etc.
Re stupidity, don't shoot the messenger Darius. Your initial mistake was neither here nor there. Your refusal to consider that you made a mistake is what is telling.

take a deep breath, we're not trying to save the friggin world. None of us have anywhere close to the data set necessary to map any of this information ... it's a hobby we like to play at ... the author claims his system maps to a Bell Curve distribution, the rest is 100% assumption, as I state in the original post by pointing out the information we have at hand, oh and the stuff that I was assuming. Your attitude that we must be 100% mathematically accurate is laughable, I don't think anyone takes this stuff that seriously!
Hurling insults on an internet forum just makes me think you need to get out more.
Funny, I thought you were being insulting.
Anyway, we interpret fantasy world using real world concepts, ok? So we should get those real world concepts right. You are stoically determined to use a nothing idea - neither real world or fantasy. Why not use a dumb-bell distribution? More appropriate.
How do you know there is insufficient information? You are not sufficiently numerate to know you are not sufficiently numerate! Like a tree does not know that it can't speak Mongolian.
You go to lots of trouble to posit a situation, then claim it is all nothing, and anyone taking it seriously should get out more?
How do you maintain a sense of self? You write so many mutually inconsistent things. Perhaps you are a Turing machine.
That must be it.
I've been playing with some numbers since we've been having all of these OP strength debates
- 20/12/2009 06:34:05 PM
1458 Views
Few glaring errors...
- 20/12/2009 09:04:55 PM
1030 Views
Re: Few glaring errors...
- 21/12/2009 07:52:18 AM
978 Views
You don't get it, do you...
- 21/12/2009 08:19:00 AM
952 Views
Didn't you claim that Eggy+Rom+Lel cannot match a male forsaken? Now they can match Lanfear?
- 21/12/2009 04:14:32 PM
830 Views
What you are missing is that
- 21/12/2009 06:46:04 PM
896 Views
I'm not missing it at all..
- 21/12/2009 06:58:04 PM
922 Views
Let's try matching that with the actual text
- 22/12/2009 03:01:36 PM
889 Views
Not correct...
- 22/12/2009 03:29:24 PM
969 Views
Believe as you like, I'm not here to convince you to otherwise, I'm stating how I read the evidence
- 22/12/2009 06:01:24 PM
867 Views
You're reading the evidence wrong.
- 22/12/2009 06:27:17 PM
866 Views
RJ also pointed out that Alivia's skill set as a weapon came in handy
- 22/12/2009 07:40:35 PM
863 Views
I thought a power law distribution is much more likely, TBH
- 20/12/2009 09:39:21 PM
937 Views
Yes. It essentially refers to a skewed histogram - biased to the lower end of the range...
- 20/12/2009 09:53:18 PM
959 Views
Corrections
- 21/12/2009 01:48:43 AM
997 Views
No...
- 21/12/2009 07:47:58 AM
871 Views
True, the application of this model is inconsistent *NM*
- 21/12/2009 02:34:26 PM
655 Views
Not if you point out that the average AS is not as strong as the overall average channeler
- 25/12/2009 04:30:17 AM
870 Views
yet RJ has said flat out that OP strength is on an Bell Curve. Meaning the majority of channelers
- 21/12/2009 07:36:22 AM
841 Views
Perhaps...
- 21/12/2009 07:52:13 AM
945 Views
I've always hated bell curves
- 21/12/2009 03:56:26 PM
856 Views
The most logical answer is that the average AOL channeler was stronger than the current average...
- 21/12/2009 06:36:07 PM
894 Views
and that in no way maps to any kind of Bell Curve
- 22/12/2009 06:02:41 PM
737 Views
Why?
- 22/12/2009 06:34:25 PM
887 Views
Can you provide the quote where RJ tells us the
- 22/12/2009 07:45:04 PM
780 Views
Always go back to the evidence...
- 22/12/2009 09:03:42 PM
933 Views
I'll respond when you can actually provide a few actual quotes to support any of this
- 23/12/2009 03:20:44 PM
841 Views
I've been looking into this a bit... and you really do overstate things to suit your arguments
- 24/12/2009 06:15:44 PM
876 Views
And in looking for quotes for another thread I came across this gem
- 29/12/2009 09:54:34 PM
851 Views
I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population
- 22/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
907 Views
Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength...
- 22/12/2009 09:21:07 PM
892 Views
Re: Except that gateway size is used multiple times by characters to judge comparative strength...
- 22/12/2009 11:32:21 PM
995 Views
I agree that it's practically impossible to determine strength
- 23/12/2009 03:19:49 PM
875 Views
How convenient. And by the way, it is NOT tied to a Talent. Anyone who is strong enough, can Travel. *NM*
- 23/12/2009 04:36:24 PM
485 Views
Seriously go re-read the series, how can you have missed that Traveling is a Talent?
- 23/12/2009 04:54:51 PM
785 Views
It is a weave, the knowledge of which guarantees that you can use it, if you are strong enough...
- 23/12/2009 05:35:36 PM
877 Views
Yet every AS can Heal to a degree and Cloud Dancing involves weaves too
- 23/12/2009 05:41:42 PM
904 Views
Lews Therin can't Heal. Aginor can't Heal. If you don't have the Talent, you can't do it. *NM*
- 23/12/2009 05:52:02 PM
504 Views
LTT and Aginor have "Little Ability" with Healing
- 23/12/2009 06:02:13 PM
919 Views
Because the channelers THEMSELVES don't use Healing to judge each other's strength...
- 23/12/2009 06:06:58 PM
836 Views
The Channelers state that there is a minimum level of strength to make the Weave work
- 23/12/2009 06:11:55 PM
996 Views
No, it makes her 25% as strong as Rand! Thanks for proving my model to be virtually perfect!
- 23/12/2009 06:36:53 PM
822 Views
This is true, however...
- 23/12/2009 04:55:48 PM
921 Views
Aviendha's gateway size doesn't decrease. She is just less energy efficient in creating it...
- 23/12/2009 05:30:17 PM
1239 Views
Aviendha is suffering from the second weave limitation
- 23/12/2009 05:37:45 PM
966 Views
Conceded. My faulty memory is to blame in this case. But it doesn't change the rule...
- 23/12/2009 06:01:33 PM
799 Views
I'll give you that there is a stength limitation to Traveling
- 23/12/2009 06:06:41 PM
809 Views
Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then? *NM*
- 23/12/2009 06:08:17 PM
454 Views
Re: Why do the characters in the books judge each other's strength on gateway size then?
- 23/12/2009 06:20:18 PM
825 Views
And there you have it...Thank you.
- 23/12/2009 06:27:24 PM
848 Views
And linked with Romanda and Lelaine
- 23/12/2009 06:34:42 PM
833 Views
Sorry. That's pure speculation on your part. *NM*
- 23/12/2009 06:38:43 PM
466 Views
No more than yours is!
- 23/12/2009 06:49:57 PM
854 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population
- 26/12/2009 12:38:43 PM
846 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population *NM*
- 26/12/2009 12:41:01 PM
437 Views
Re: I don't think we have a representative sample of the mode in this population
- 26/12/2009 06:37:50 PM
858 Views
Goodness
- 31/12/2009 03:37:23 AM
864 Views
I'm working within the context of what we've been told by the author
- 31/12/2009 03:43:31 AM
807 Views
No you are not
- 31/12/2009 03:58:28 AM
865 Views
Dude we're discussion works of fiction
- 31/12/2009 04:08:12 AM
921 Views
Dumb Bell Distribution of Mongoloid Turings
- 31/12/2009 04:36:50 AM
953 Views
Back to school AS, and you will be able to do this
- 26/12/2009 12:34:39 PM
825 Views
The problem we're working with is that RJ says strength follows a Bell Curve distribution
- 26/12/2009 03:29:26 PM
842 Views
And RJ knew his maths (and you don't)
- 31/12/2009 03:22:09 AM
893 Views
I'm not the one who said OP strength followed a Bell Curve Distribution
- 31/12/2009 03:34:55 AM
852 Views


