Active Users:222 Time:06/05/2024 03:54:13 PM
Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 17/03/2010 05:35:08 PM
Essentially, he's saying that the main characters have never had to make any real difficult or morally ambiguous choices.

Rand has never had to overthrow an otherwise good man for not joining him (the nobles are generally pictured as worthless), Egwene didn't have to actually war against the tower, or deal with Elaida, and so on. Everyone (for the most part) manages to come out of their trials squeaky-clean.


Hmm.

The "unpleasantness" after the Aiel War might qualify for this. We still don't know everything that happened, there. Black Ajah, secret killings, and more. There might have been a group of Aes Sedai that were pretty brutal in trying to figure out what the BA was up to.

Perrin allowing the Seancean to collar the Shaido Wise Ones could be a big one, although it's mostly been glossed over.

Rand's balefiring of Graendal's keep? Could be, but it IS one of the Forsaken...

Mat leaving enemy soldiers to die, instead of offering aid? Eh.

Yeah, I see what you mean. None of these are really in the category of what you were saying.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Did the characters come too easily to power? - 16/03/2010 11:37:31 PM 1778 Views
hehe I think I fell asleep during that read :p *NM* - 17/03/2010 01:12:55 AM 366 Views
Yes, and for Rand at least IMO, playing nice has cost dearly - 17/03/2010 04:59:32 AM 822 Views
Not necessarily - 18/03/2010 03:17:10 PM 768 Views
Good post. - 27/03/2010 01:43:24 PM 631 Views
Unfortunately, no. - 31/03/2010 10:23:58 AM 740 Views
Re: Unfortunately, no. - 02/04/2010 07:54:10 AM 577 Views
All the way through, up to ripping her self-delusional assessments of her "achievements" in KoD - 02/04/2010 09:27:54 PM 646 Views
A shame I missed it, then - 04/04/2010 08:55:40 AM 643 Views
Re: A shame I missed it, then - 10/04/2010 08:17:38 AM 607 Views
Cliffs notes anyone? *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:31:02 AM 1445 Views
TLDR *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:43:01 AM 527 Views
Trolloc luRns da Reeading? - 17/03/2010 08:27:23 AM 765 Views
Too long, didnt read *NM* - 17/03/2010 04:23:34 PM 309 Views
Cmon ppl pls reply to this, Cannoli has spent such a long time writing it.... I couldn't be bothered *NM* - 17/03/2010 10:31:38 AM 331 Views
*NM* - 17/03/2010 10:32:04 AM 340 Views
Re: Did the characters come too easily to power? - 17/03/2010 01:38:02 PM 757 Views
Thank you *NM* - 18/03/2010 03:17:52 PM 421 Views
I agree, very well written and thought out. - 19/03/2010 07:32:59 AM 704 Views
I did read it and it was good - 17/03/2010 02:33:26 PM 639 Views
I agree... *NM* - 17/03/2010 02:48:19 PM 357 Views
That depends on certain interpretations... - 18/03/2010 03:29:15 PM 851 Views
Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 02:49:55 PM 717 Views
Re: Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 06:15:18 PM 686 Views
I agree - 18/03/2010 03:35:05 PM 782 Views
Strong vs. Hard in other words - 19/03/2010 05:10:41 AM 621 Views
Loooong *NM* - 17/03/2010 03:52:25 PM 375 Views
Look who's talking - look at how you write "long" ! - 18/03/2010 02:06:42 PM 619 Views
Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 05:35:08 PM 703 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 10:08:34 PM 828 Views
Oh and I forgot to add - 18/03/2010 01:41:28 AM 733 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 18/03/2010 03:37:09 PM 710 Views
I think this is an excellent analysis - 18/03/2010 01:56:33 PM 704 Views
Thanks. *NM* - 18/03/2010 04:28:52 PM 387 Views
While most of this is true... - 19/03/2010 06:47:19 AM 614 Views
Siuan's failure to properly help Rand should motivate Egwene to overthrow...oh, right. Egwene. - 19/03/2010 11:52:10 PM 664 Views
What do you mean by "properly"? - 20/03/2010 07:57:26 AM 632 Views
She did that because the Black Ajah was her personal boogeyman - 20/03/2010 09:58:54 AM 764 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 06/04/2010 06:00:07 AM 670 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 07/04/2010 11:31:47 PM 889 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 09/04/2010 06:22:38 AM 608 Views

Reply to Message