Active Users:264 Time:06/05/2024 11:20:01 AM
Re: The To'Raken Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 06/04/2010 06:00:07 AM
An example of this, on a very small scale, would be Egwene killing the to’raken carrying away Aes Sedai prisoners from the Tower. She thinks highly of the Tower and sees these women as her subjects and her responsibility, or as her possessions and adornments to her power, depending on your view of her. However, she has to do what is best for the Tower and the world, and that means killing Seanchan forces and doing what she can to cripple their war machine. If some of her daughters/pets/minions have to die with them, too damn bad. But that example is one of battle where the lines of life and death are clearly drawn, and even right and wrong gives way to a much simpler delineation: “them and us.”


Did Egwene have any reason to suspect that any of them knew Travelling? Even if she did, it's a big assumption to think she could kill ALL of the raken - for all she knew, by the time she entered the battle, Elaida had already been captured.

In terms of the AS becoming damane - they are still held by the Oaths, plus they, well, pretty much suck at combat. If they heal Seanchan soldiers, I don't think that's such a big deal. And in the timeframe before T'G (I doubt it's more than a month, or two at most) there's little chance that the captive AS would be completely broken to the point they couldn't be "reclaimed" back into the WT. I'd actually go as far as saying their emprisonment could be GOOD for the light - it's not unreasonable to think that Rand and Tuon will form some kind of alliance before the LB, and when they do, they'll have a few hundred extra trained damane who have learned combat weaves and whose Oaths still allow them to kill Shadowspawn. Which, I think you'll agree, is better than them sitting in the tower studying poetry. Their capture doesn't reflect well on Egwene, but her compassion/pity in sparing their lives might make a big difference in the end.
This message last edited by Lord Haart on 06/04/2010 at 06:00:28 AM
Reply to message
Did the characters come too easily to power? - 16/03/2010 11:37:31 PM 1777 Views
hehe I think I fell asleep during that read :p *NM* - 17/03/2010 01:12:55 AM 366 Views
Yes, and for Rand at least IMO, playing nice has cost dearly - 17/03/2010 04:59:32 AM 821 Views
Not necessarily - 18/03/2010 03:17:10 PM 768 Views
Good post. - 27/03/2010 01:43:24 PM 630 Views
Unfortunately, no. - 31/03/2010 10:23:58 AM 740 Views
Re: Unfortunately, no. - 02/04/2010 07:54:10 AM 576 Views
All the way through, up to ripping her self-delusional assessments of her "achievements" in KoD - 02/04/2010 09:27:54 PM 646 Views
A shame I missed it, then - 04/04/2010 08:55:40 AM 642 Views
Re: A shame I missed it, then - 10/04/2010 08:17:38 AM 606 Views
Cliffs notes anyone? *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:31:02 AM 1445 Views
TLDR *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:43:01 AM 527 Views
Trolloc luRns da Reeading? - 17/03/2010 08:27:23 AM 763 Views
Too long, didnt read *NM* - 17/03/2010 04:23:34 PM 308 Views
Cmon ppl pls reply to this, Cannoli has spent such a long time writing it.... I couldn't be bothered *NM* - 17/03/2010 10:31:38 AM 330 Views
*NM* - 17/03/2010 10:32:04 AM 340 Views
Re: Did the characters come too easily to power? - 17/03/2010 01:38:02 PM 757 Views
Thank you *NM* - 18/03/2010 03:17:52 PM 421 Views
I agree, very well written and thought out. - 19/03/2010 07:32:59 AM 704 Views
I did read it and it was good - 17/03/2010 02:33:26 PM 639 Views
I agree... *NM* - 17/03/2010 02:48:19 PM 357 Views
That depends on certain interpretations... - 18/03/2010 03:29:15 PM 851 Views
Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 02:49:55 PM 717 Views
Re: Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 06:15:18 PM 686 Views
I agree - 18/03/2010 03:35:05 PM 782 Views
Strong vs. Hard in other words - 19/03/2010 05:10:41 AM 621 Views
Loooong *NM* - 17/03/2010 03:52:25 PM 375 Views
Look who's talking - look at how you write "long" ! - 18/03/2010 02:06:42 PM 618 Views
Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 05:35:08 PM 702 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 10:08:34 PM 828 Views
Oh and I forgot to add - 18/03/2010 01:41:28 AM 732 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 18/03/2010 03:37:09 PM 709 Views
I think this is an excellent analysis - 18/03/2010 01:56:33 PM 703 Views
Thanks. *NM* - 18/03/2010 04:28:52 PM 387 Views
While most of this is true... - 19/03/2010 06:47:19 AM 613 Views
Siuan's failure to properly help Rand should motivate Egwene to overthrow...oh, right. Egwene. - 19/03/2010 11:52:10 PM 663 Views
What do you mean by "properly"? - 20/03/2010 07:57:26 AM 631 Views
She did that because the Black Ajah was her personal boogeyman - 20/03/2010 09:58:54 AM 764 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 06/04/2010 06:00:07 AM 670 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 07/04/2010 11:31:47 PM 889 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 09/04/2010 06:22:38 AM 607 Views

Reply to Message