Active Users:490 Time:02/05/2025 05:36:09 PM
You're not using "archaic" correctly Larry Send a noteboard - 20/04/2010 10:07:31 PM
My roommate is an ecology major, and studying "how organisms affect and are affected by other members, living and non-living alike, of local and global systems" seems to be exactly what he does. In fact, he just defined it to me now as "the study of interactions of organisms with one another and with their environment." Which is pretty much what Larry said, except Larry, to quote my roommate, "went one step further and defined 'environment.'"

So... I'm pretty sure what Larry said is a very correct and modern definition of the word "ecology."


Now talk to an english major and get the definition for conotative and denotative meaning.

Words and pharses have multiple meaning in english depending on context. How many different meanings can you communicate with the word "no"?

Archaic, as in not what the word conveys in common speech, in a given context. If I say "I am going to the theater." You will most likely think of movies, but what if I mean a play. If I say "I am going outside and burn a faggot", you will probably call the police to stop a murder, but what if I mean a cigarette, or perhaps to start a campfire. English is a tricky beast.

Make sense now?

The scientific and common definition/concept of a word offen are at odds. It is all about the context.


First off, it's not an antiquated use of the word. If anything, ecology is an inkhorn portmanteau that caught on in scientific and later, popular culture and it has very few variant meanings. Its meaning does not vary across regions, countries, or time. So arguing that it is "archaic" is a very strange set of reasoning.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Frank Herbert, Dune Chronicles (series reviews within) - 16/04/2010 04:11:40 AM 1940 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 16/04/2010 06:09:49 PM 1055 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 17/04/2010 12:08:06 AM 1245 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 17/04/2010 02:33:38 PM 1173 Views
I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological" - 18/04/2010 12:13:14 AM 1174 Views
Re: I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological" - 18/04/2010 03:34:33 AM 1224 Views
Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white? - 18/04/2010 05:18:07 AM 1032 Views
Re: Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white? - 19/04/2010 06:15:26 PM 1062 Views
That was most of my issue. - 21/04/2010 12:12:56 AM 929 Views
Re: That was most of my issue. - 21/04/2010 06:33:14 PM 903 Views
Re: That was most of my issue. - 29/04/2010 11:38:26 PM 896 Views
Just because something plays a dominate role doesn't make it a theme - 21/04/2010 02:09:42 PM 1028 Views
A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present - 21/04/2010 11:21:38 PM 958 Views
Re: A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present - 22/04/2010 04:58:01 AM 939 Views
Good points - 22/04/2010 09:19:45 PM 979 Views
Re: Good points - 22/04/2010 10:55:21 PM 924 Views
when you call it human ecology I come much closer to agreeing - 22/04/2010 02:16:58 PM 954 Views
Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic. - 19/04/2010 07:52:27 PM 1054 Views
Re: Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic. - 20/04/2010 07:04:40 PM 916 Views
You're not using "archaic" correctly - 20/04/2010 10:07:31 PM 920 Views
Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all. - 21/04/2010 01:46:50 AM 808 Views
doesn't that regulate the point down to interesting trivia? - 21/04/2010 02:36:38 PM 959 Views
Re: Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all. - 21/04/2010 06:23:24 PM 1035 Views
Funny the things people focus on - 21/04/2010 11:24:59 PM 931 Views
Re: Funny the things people focus on - 23/04/2010 05:28:54 PM 934 Views
People who see this as an ecological book are missing the point of the book - 16/04/2010 06:28:40 PM 1416 Views
Books can have more than one theme. Great books almost always do. *NM* - 16/04/2010 07:15:11 PM 461 Views
I agree with that I just never really the ecological theme to Dune - 16/04/2010 10:12:26 PM 1117 Views
Ecology goes more than one way - 17/04/2010 12:12:45 AM 1070 Views
There are several points to the book/series - 17/04/2010 12:11:38 AM 1138 Views
Everyone get something different from a book - 19/04/2010 07:01:51 PM 1324 Views
I believe those themes become more pronounced later in the series - 20/04/2010 10:09:36 PM 1078 Views
I remember having hated every single character of this book. Some random thoughts - 17/04/2010 05:08:25 PM 1267 Views
I hope you got to Darwi Odrade - 21/04/2010 03:44:27 PM 956 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 17/04/2010 08:05:16 PM 1522 Views
I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 17/04/2010 10:22:27 PM 1319 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 18/04/2010 04:38:10 AM 1273 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 19/04/2010 04:04:43 AM 1201 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 22/04/2010 04:31:26 AM 956 Views
I thought all of Dune had begun as a serial in a SF magazine. *NM* - 22/04/2010 01:58:22 PM 404 Views
And Dune Messiah as well was serialized at first, in Galaxy *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:31:54 PM 409 Views
Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 19/04/2010 08:42:18 AM 1174 Views
Re: Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 21/04/2010 03:33:46 PM 909 Views
I didn't see that in Alia - 21/04/2010 11:27:22 PM 855 Views
One of my favorite series! - 21/04/2010 03:30:57 PM 856 Views
I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it - 21/04/2010 11:29:50 PM 778 Views
Re: I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it - 22/04/2010 04:02:26 PM 898 Views
His style doesn't appeal to me as much, unfortunately - 22/04/2010 09:17:21 PM 782 Views
You might want to track down his short stories one day... - 23/04/2010 02:06:09 PM 1011 Views
Children of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 22/04/2010 06:47:04 AM 976 Views
See...I think I made a mistake in my reading of Dune - 22/04/2010 07:26:28 AM 956 Views
Depends - 22/04/2010 08:01:39 AM 861 Views
Re: Depends - 22/04/2010 11:12:15 PM 1127 Views
read something else - 23/04/2010 07:49:34 PM 849 Views
LA Times article on Dune (4/18/2010) - 23/04/2010 10:59:00 AM 807 Views
God Emperor of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 25/04/2010 02:03:37 AM 1077 Views
Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 28/04/2010 06:02:54 AM 818 Views
Re: Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 29/04/2010 03:26:28 PM 895 Views
I read the wiki synopses of those two books - 29/04/2010 09:44:07 PM 857 Views
Re: I read the wiki synopses of those two books - 10/05/2010 04:10:49 AM 1198 Views
Chapterhouse: Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 30/04/2010 02:31:10 PM 1006 Views
Re: Chapterhouse: Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 10/05/2010 01:24:33 AM 1047 Views

Reply to Message