Active Users:260 Time:05/05/2024 09:47:46 PM
My main thoughts on Solaris by Stanislaw Lem everynametaken Send a noteboard - 23/04/2010 02:50:10 AM
Instead of reviewing the story and then launching into some deeper thinking about what Lem may be telling us I want to just delve into two main themes I found myself thinking about. The first is what most think is Lem’s main message – if we one day make contact with an alien life form will we ever have any hope of actually communicating with it in any meaningful way?

In the book there are two large passages that imply the futility of such an idea. The first large passage of scientific review gives us a history of Solaristic studies that are described in terms of volumes and thousands of pages. Yet, at the end of over a hundred years plus years of such studies there is no consensus as to whether the planet is alive or not. Of course by the end of the book we do know the planet is alive in some way but not exactly how or in what way. Again, now that the current Solarists know the planet is alive can they possibly know in what way its intelligence works? Can they communicate with it?

The second large passage of scientific review in the book describes the history of the study of the different oceanic and cloud-like formations Solaris makes. Again, in one hundred plus years of study all the Solarists have been able to do is categorize the formations by what they do but really have no insight into what they mean. Keeping in line with the point Lem is making in the book the character of Kelvin is beginning by this point to recognize the futility of trying to determine any “meaning” in them and indeed by the end of the book there is never any indication as to what Solaris is manifesting in such formations.

Is the appearance of the visitors a form of communication? I think this question merits attention because on the surface it seems that Solaris is trying to do something but then this activity begs the question – what is it trying to do? Is it trying to communicate? Or is it too performing an experiment?

I was somewhat disappointed by some descriptions I found on the Internet as to the nature of the visitors. The overwhelming view that people seemed to have was that Solaris was intentionally dredging up the worst repressed memories the researchers had. In truth Lem never really reveals to us just what Solaris is doing but I think that underscores his point about communication with alien life forms (that it wouldn’t be comprehensible). Even though the experiences seemed traumatic for the crew members it cannot be said that that was the ocean’s intentions. Snow even suggests at the end of the book that the visitors might have been “presents” of a sort.

Returning to the two scientific reviews in the book I want to discuss a second although lesser theme in the book. Lem is not only describing the frustrations he predicts will come with contact with alien life but he is also making fun to some extent of academia and in particular scientific experimentation and its limits. After all, the first passage describes thousands of pages and numerous volumes of theories about whether Solaris is alive or not and what is the end result of all that? They don’t know! Likewise in the second review of literature the history of Solaristics has managed to document and categorize the complex formations Solaris makes but yet in the end all that categorization really says nothing.

Let’s think about the state of research currently and ask ourselves a question. What do we really know about anything? For example, in the topic of neuroscience we map out different brain activities, neural patterns associated with different modes of thinking, different types of behavior, correlations between patterning and different chemical states, and so on. But in the end of billions of dollars and countless hours of research what do we really know? Have we really explained anything or have we just made more and more categorizations and descriptions of phenomena that we will never really understand?

In many ways our own subjective intelligence and how it works is as alien to us as Solaris is to Kelvin and company. We know it is there and that it displays “forms” if you will but we really know very little about it or what it is. And though it is highly unlikely that we will ever really know what our consciousness “is” we will continue to want to research and categorize it no matter what traumatic or disturbing things are dredged up in response to our probing. I find it telling that at the end of the book after everything that has happened with the visitors Snow is ready to continue probing Solaris with more experiments!
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Sci-Fi Book Club: SOLARIS by Stanislaw Lem - 19/04/2010 05:50:45 PM 1813 Views
Roll-Call: Have you read it? Are you reading it? Like it: Yes/NO? *NM* - 19/04/2010 05:52:00 PM 617 Views
I read it back in January. - 19/04/2010 06:23:29 PM 1121 Views
I read it years ago, and liked it. *NM* - 19/04/2010 06:41:36 PM 592 Views
I just finished it. - 19/04/2010 06:54:49 PM 1063 Views
Well, to be fair, - 20/04/2010 08:12:17 PM 1017 Views
Heh. - 21/04/2010 08:31:51 AM 1246 Views
Re: Well, to be fair, - 12/05/2010 09:06:06 PM 988 Views
That was how I felt too. - 20/04/2010 11:39:15 PM 839 Views
I read it 3 years ago, and liked it. - 19/04/2010 06:58:37 PM 1304 Views
I read it, and liked it. - 19/04/2010 07:33:16 PM 1108 Views
I plan to - 19/04/2010 07:41:21 PM 1200 Views
I might re-read it in a few days - 19/04/2010 09:11:35 PM 1016 Views
I'm currently reading it - 20/04/2010 10:00:05 AM 1283 Views
That has always bothered me too. - 20/04/2010 08:20:56 PM 891 Views
Indeed - 11/05/2010 03:02:26 PM 953 Views
It was a while since I've read it - 22/04/2010 05:33:44 AM 917 Views
I have started reading it - 11/05/2010 11:10:53 AM 876 Views
Translation: - 19/04/2010 05:54:57 PM 1169 Views
I read it in Russian, which was very close to the original. - 19/04/2010 06:25:00 PM 1152 Views
I'm not sure now, I think I read it in Dutch. - 19/04/2010 06:43:30 PM 1074 Views
English translation by Joanna Kilmartin and Steve Cox (1970). - 19/04/2010 06:56:54 PM 1036 Views
Translation of a translation, actually. *NM* - 19/04/2010 07:22:18 PM 559 Views
Yes, I did read Jake's intro piece there. *NM* - 19/04/2010 07:23:44 PM 568 Views
I figured you were not accurate enough. - 19/04/2010 07:26:54 PM 1016 Views
Pffft. Accuracy is for nerds. - 19/04/2010 07:31:52 PM 1099 Views
That was the one I read. - 20/04/2010 01:43:01 AM 1230 Views
I read it in Czech - 19/04/2010 07:40:05 PM 1284 Views
I also read a Swedish translation. - 19/04/2010 07:41:31 PM 1389 Views
1970 translation from French to English by Joanna Kilmartin and Steve Cox - 20/04/2010 02:20:42 AM 1140 Views
I have a different opinion on this. - 20/04/2010 08:17:06 PM 1033 Views
I've read it in Polish - 22/04/2010 05:32:33 AM 871 Views
Re: So it's flat and boring? - 23/04/2010 09:50:38 PM 1003 Views
Re: Does anyone know why the Polish publishers haven't commissioned another translation? - 24/04/2010 10:04:38 AM 987 Views
Rights issues, I beieve - 24/04/2010 10:48:53 AM 1041 Views
So 'we' have read the novel in 6 different languages. - 27/04/2010 09:20:02 PM 886 Views
I read the English from French translation - 12/05/2010 09:10:42 PM 852 Views
This was my general experience as well. - 17/05/2010 06:53:58 PM 894 Views
I probably got more out of it than I first thought. - 20/04/2010 11:37:52 PM 842 Views
Re: I do that too! - 23/04/2010 09:51:39 PM 875 Views
It is certainly a book that makes you think... - 26/04/2010 09:46:31 PM 900 Views
Literature vs. Genre Fiction - 21/04/2010 02:33:21 PM 1085 Views
Re: Literature vs. Genre Fiction - 21/04/2010 08:44:24 PM 1028 Views
Re: Literature vs. Genre Fiction - 12/05/2010 09:19:31 PM 911 Views
Re: - 21/04/2010 09:09:02 PM 967 Views
How do you know Solaris was an advanced intelligence? - 22/04/2010 01:20:35 AM 894 Views
Fair enough. - 22/04/2010 09:04:58 PM 961 Views
But I think that is Lem's point. - 23/04/2010 03:20:18 AM 967 Views
Good point Tom. - 23/04/2010 03:14:23 AM 868 Views
It's definitely literature - 22/04/2010 01:19:34 AM 832 Views
You might be winning me over to your thoughts here. - 26/04/2010 09:42:33 PM 821 Views
As long as you realize... - 26/04/2010 10:26:00 PM 869 Views
This is why I sort of float around on this issue. - 27/04/2010 05:49:39 PM 907 Views
Re: This is why I sort of float around on this issue. - 13/05/2010 10:15:38 AM 940 Views
Very well put. - 17/05/2010 06:51:27 PM 849 Views
Re: Very well put. - 17/05/2010 06:53:13 PM 953 Views
This book is definitely literature. - 23/04/2010 02:59:48 AM 971 Views
Re: This discussion gives me hives. *NM* - 23/04/2010 09:52:09 PM 524 Views
Understandable. - 26/04/2010 07:31:08 PM 835 Views
Hmmm - 12/05/2010 09:18:42 PM 939 Views
What didn't you enjoy? - 21/04/2010 09:47:06 PM 833 Views
I didn't like the excessive description of the types of clouds on Solaris. - 22/04/2010 01:17:22 AM 813 Views
This was what I disliked too - 22/04/2010 05:46:05 AM 1029 Views
Re: I didn't like the excessive description of the types of clouds on Solaris. - 23/04/2010 03:33:14 AM 902 Views
Re: I found it made this stark contrast with his descriptions of his own, more human environment. - 24/04/2010 09:56:40 AM 1089 Views
That is an interesting take. - 27/04/2010 05:53:23 PM 941 Views
I didn't really find anything difficult about it. - 23/04/2010 03:38:48 AM 915 Views
The only thing that bothered me... - 03/05/2010 07:06:42 PM 1068 Views
So, is there really anything to discuss about the story itself? - 22/04/2010 08:55:03 AM 1015 Views
Apparently not. - 22/04/2010 01:38:24 PM 1058 Views
True - 22/04/2010 09:29:53 PM 893 Views
Point of fact, - 23/04/2010 02:53:47 PM 937 Views
Perhaps it's time for a self-reevaluation then - 24/04/2010 10:45:44 AM 1266 Views
Thank you for telling me how I should prioritize my life, Larry. - 26/04/2010 04:54:01 PM 1068 Views
At least I am not as quick to repeat the same excuses - 26/04/2010 05:13:08 PM 1225 Views
I was originally gonna reply to your previous post, then decided not to. Guess I will now. - 26/04/2010 05:42:15 PM 1056 Views
Thank you. - 26/04/2010 07:41:17 PM 1023 Views
One point... - 26/04/2010 07:34:02 PM 906 Views
Posting while irritated and about to crash does little good, it seems - 27/04/2010 06:20:19 PM 979 Views
The delay to the review is my fault. I've got a mostly finished one. I'm just not happy with it. - 27/04/2010 07:19:35 PM 965 Views
It wasn't the review I was irritated about, but thanks for doing it - 27/04/2010 07:39:08 PM 851 Views
Ah. OK. - 27/04/2010 07:47:09 PM 1014 Views
Thanks - 27/04/2010 07:58:54 PM 905 Views
I'm a bit ambivalent on the merits of this approach of yours. - 26/04/2010 05:32:19 PM 855 Views
You highlight my only frustration with the thread. - 26/04/2010 05:48:01 PM 1176 Views
Re: So what do you think about any of those things? - 23/04/2010 08:30:55 PM 879 Views
A question about Lem. - 23/04/2010 03:49:57 AM 947 Views
I've only read one other book by him, The Cyberiad - 23/04/2010 04:03:19 AM 1008 Views
Re: A question about Lem. - 23/04/2010 07:26:18 PM 995 Views
Thanks. - 24/04/2010 06:42:05 AM 1020 Views
Yes - 24/04/2010 02:43:17 PM 971 Views
My main thoughts on Solaris by Stanislaw Lem - 23/04/2010 02:50:10 AM 1235 Views
Re: About that "worst" thoughts issue. - 23/04/2010 09:49:04 PM 1149 Views
Re: About that "worst" thoughts issue. - 12/05/2010 09:35:48 PM 1032 Views
I came away with the same message you did on the first point. - 25/04/2010 04:46:09 PM 874 Views
Re: My main thoughts on Solaris by Stanislaw Lem - 12/05/2010 09:31:32 PM 1040 Views
Re: So I have no team spirit and should be lynched. - 23/04/2010 09:41:48 PM 871 Views
I finally watched Avatar for the first time tonight. - 25/04/2010 04:27:34 AM 877 Views
Solaris was, I hope, better than Avatar. - 25/04/2010 04:54:12 AM 838 Views
Misplaced answer . *NM* - 25/04/2010 04:40:27 PM 438 Views
On identity and communication: do we love only ourselves? - 25/04/2010 03:35:34 PM 922 Views
The argument: (From the text and some thoughts) - 27/04/2010 06:22:34 PM 854 Views
Yes - 12/05/2010 10:10:30 PM 999 Views
That is a great idea... - 17/05/2010 06:58:48 PM 950 Views
Re: That is a great idea... - 17/05/2010 07:02:44 PM 957 Views
That settles it. I am going to have to reread it. - 13/05/2010 12:23:14 AM 891 Views
It is interesting you should say that. - 12/05/2010 09:56:26 PM 1126 Views
That is the second time this week that I have heard something about Derrida. Now I am going to have - 13/05/2010 12:02:56 AM 991 Views
Derrida is great. - 13/05/2010 10:06:49 AM 1001 Views
Is Solaris alive? Is Solaris sentient? - 25/04/2010 03:40:57 PM 883 Views
I can't decide. - 25/04/2010 03:54:39 PM 1038 Views
An interesting point to consider... - 25/04/2010 10:41:17 PM 1039 Views
Re: I can't decide. - 12/05/2010 10:05:21 PM 844 Views
Re: Is Solaris alive? Is Solaris sentient? - 25/04/2010 10:31:58 PM 995 Views
Ooohhhh. I like that theory. - 25/04/2010 11:32:15 PM 1010 Views
Does it make a difference? - 26/04/2010 07:29:44 PM 850 Views
Re: Is Solaris alive? Is Solaris sentient? - 12/05/2010 09:57:05 PM 989 Views
What do you think the biggest message of the book is? - 25/04/2010 03:47:03 PM 953 Views
Re: Does he let go of her? How independant is she of him? - 25/04/2010 04:07:33 PM 986 Views
That's an interesting observation. - 26/04/2010 10:23:28 PM 864 Views
Re: I was telling Tashmere... - 11/05/2010 11:05:09 AM 1005 Views
Re: What do you think the biggest message of the book is? - 25/04/2010 10:16:16 PM 939 Views
Communication with the entirely other - 12/05/2010 10:01:37 PM 966 Views
Did anyone else do any wondering what their own visitors would take the form of if they were there? - 26/04/2010 11:31:27 PM 870 Views
Actually, no. It was obvious to me. *NM* - 26/04/2010 11:41:22 PM 425 Views
In a way yes. - 27/04/2010 06:33:43 PM 948 Views
My father, perhaps. - 27/04/2010 08:55:18 PM 873 Views
Ha. - 27/04/2010 09:16:56 PM 892 Views

Reply to Message