Well, there was that South Carolina author who wrote some extensions of a Texas author's famous short stories involving a certain barbarian, yet he seemed to have done well for himself. Would you have slapped that South Carolina author as well, if you hadn't read what else he had produced? 

Nah. I don't care about Conan. There would have been other reasons for slapping RJ. I only care here because Adams is a treasure and they are prostituting him.
Of course, I didn't think Adams' last few stories were all that great, so I'm curious to see if there's any improvement here
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
- 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
1983 Views
I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
1574 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
1601 Views
Hmm
- 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
1570 Views
Re: Hmm
- 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
1536 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
- 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
1574 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
1436 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
1519 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
- 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
1530 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
- 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
1610 Views
It does sound really good
- 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
1462 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1499 Views
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1499 Views
Highly monogamous
- 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
1492 Views
This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
1524 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
1569 Views
best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
1566 Views
Re: best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
1403 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
1643 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
1492 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
857 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
806 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
- 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
1402 Views
RT stole my post title.
- 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
1617 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
- 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
1518 Views
Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
1563 Views
Re: Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
1592 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1385 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1385 Views
Re:
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1363 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1363 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
1412 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
1585 Views
That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1539 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1539 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1385 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1385 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
- 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
1476 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
- 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
1513 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
- 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
1644 Views
where?
- 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
1413 Views
Here
- 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
1575 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
- 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
1509 Views



