Well, there was that South Carolina author who wrote some extensions of a Texas author's famous short stories involving a certain barbarian, yet he seemed to have done well for himself. Would you have slapped that South Carolina author as well, if you hadn't read what else he had produced? 

Nah. I don't care about Conan. There would have been other reasons for slapping RJ. I only care here because Adams is a treasure and they are prostituting him.
Of course, I didn't think Adams' last few stories were all that great, so I'm curious to see if there's any improvement here

Think Dune, Larry. Surely you know the pain.
I'll just think of Neil Gaiman writing a Sherlock Holmes mystery

That is very different.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
- 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
1982 Views
I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
1574 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
1601 Views
Hmm
- 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
1566 Views
Re: Hmm
- 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
1535 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
- 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
1572 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
1436 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
1516 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
- 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
1527 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
- 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
1607 Views
It does sound really good
- 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
1460 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1496 Views
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1496 Views
Highly monogamous
- 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
1491 Views
This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
1523 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
1568 Views
best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
1565 Views
Re: best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
1400 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
1642 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
1491 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
855 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
805 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
- 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
1399 Views
RT stole my post title.
- 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
1614 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
- 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
1514 Views
Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
1559 Views
Re: Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
1589 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1383 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1383 Views
Re:
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1362 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1362 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
1410 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
1582 Views
That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1536 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1536 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1384 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1384 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
- 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
1473 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
- 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
1512 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
- 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
1642 Views
where?
- 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
1412 Views
Here
- 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
1572 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
- 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
1507 Views



