Well, there was that South Carolina author who wrote some extensions of a Texas author's famous short stories involving a certain barbarian, yet he seemed to have done well for himself. Would you have slapped that South Carolina author as well, if you hadn't read what else he had produced? 

Nah. I don't care about Conan. There would have been other reasons for slapping RJ. I only care here because Adams is a treasure and they are prostituting him.
Of course, I didn't think Adams' last few stories were all that great, so I'm curious to see if there's any improvement here

Think Dune, Larry. Surely you know the pain.
I'll just think of Neil Gaiman writing a Sherlock Holmes mystery

That is very different.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
- 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
1926 Views
I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
1509 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
1548 Views
Hmm
- 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
1516 Views
Re: Hmm
- 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
1488 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
- 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
1514 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
1390 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
1455 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
- 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
1478 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
- 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
1546 Views
It does sound really good
- 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
1399 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1443 Views
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1443 Views
Highly monogamous
- 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
1433 Views
This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
1476 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
1511 Views
best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
1497 Views
Re: best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
1338 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
1558 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
1437 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
833 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
781 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
- 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
1345 Views
RT stole my post title.
- 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
1545 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
- 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
1458 Views
Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
1505 Views
Re: Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
1532 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1333 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1333 Views
Re:
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1310 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1310 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
1361 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
1530 Views
That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1456 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1456 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1328 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1328 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
- 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
1429 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
- 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
1464 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
- 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
1587 Views
where?
- 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
1365 Views
Here
- 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
1505 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
- 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
1453 Views



