Contempt might be stronger than what I would have said, but yes, it's sad to see willful stunting of one's cognitive abilities by limiting one's self to narrow bounds of exploration, regardless if it's reading only a certain type of fiction/non-fiction or only doing this or that activity. Such people tend to make for excellent dullards when it comes to people wanting a wide-ranging conversation or other social interaction.
I don't really think it's fair to call people "dullards" or say that they "limit theirselves to narrow bounds of exploration" when you're judging by the sole criterium of whether or not they read serious literature. For all you know they do lots of interesting things and broaden their minds in all sorts of ways, just not through literature - while perhaps still enjoying popcorn literature as a way of relaxation.
Some of the more interesting people I know are travelers or farmers, but I also believe if one wants to discuss literature, one should not limit one's self to reading "popcorn" books. It'd be much the same as discussing cinematic technique with someone who watches only Michael Bay movies.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
Aren't the Tolkien comparisons getting a little...old?
- 09/12/2011 09:51:39 PM
2763 Views
The comparison bothers me, but not because Tolkien isn't relevant.
- 09/12/2011 10:05:22 PM
1636 Views
Only when shit works are being compared to him
- 09/12/2011 10:22:26 PM
1538 Views
Larry,
- 10/12/2011 01:13:18 AM
1554 Views
Snide dismissal that will be passed off as for his own entertainment.
- 10/12/2011 04:55:43 AM
1457 Views
Well-deserved condescension.
- 11/12/2011 03:54:27 AM
1584 Views
You're sure about that?
- 11/12/2011 04:20:26 AM
1813 Views
Re: You're sure about that?
- 11/12/2011 05:25:08 AM
1540 Views
Re: You're sure about that?
- 11/12/2011 06:03:02 AM
1405 Views
i think you shouldn't judge a whole world's school programs on your school 
- 11/12/2011 06:42:30 AM
1445 Views
- 11/12/2011 06:42:30 AM
1445 Views
If you're arguing that children should be able to read genre fiction, fine.
- 11/12/2011 08:52:27 PM
1330 Views
Well, I suppose it depends on the type of genre being read
- 11/12/2011 09:36:16 PM
1578 Views
How often do you hear the challenging writers mentioned at this site?
- 12/12/2011 02:03:05 PM
1307 Views
Only when you, me, and a couple others write reviews
- 12/12/2011 04:21:14 PM
1697 Views
Oh, it was the same as it always is
- 12/12/2011 05:23:56 PM
1417 Views
Much of the actual "Classics", that is, Greek and Latin originals, kids would eat up.
- 12/12/2011 03:13:03 AM
1317 Views
You're upfront and honest about it; he isn't. The difference matters to me. *NM*
- 11/12/2011 05:18:42 AM
770 Views
this is a bit off topic, but out of curiousity...
- 11/12/2011 06:28:35 AM
1529 Views
I've discussed this dozens of times at this site. Perhaps you've missed all of the posts.
- 11/12/2011 08:57:44 PM
1469 Views
mk I'll go look. I probably did miss it (or at least don't remember it!)
- 11/12/2011 09:08:02 PM
1433 Views
I have a successful career that was inspired by the video games I played as a child. *NM*
- 11/12/2011 05:52:21 PM
804 Views
Now let's get all the people who just pissed their lives away with video games and see the %.
- 11/12/2011 08:58:42 PM
1566 Views
The majority of players neither waste their lives nor make a career out of it.
- 11/12/2011 11:29:29 PM
1461 Views
Yeah, sorry, I don't think you could say that with a straight face in real life. *NM*
- 12/12/2011 04:13:52 AM
733 Views
Then you have a closed mind on the subject. Ironic, considering your stance on edification. *NM*
- 12/12/2011 05:47:50 AM
673 Views
No, just with respect to you. *NM*
- 12/12/2011 02:00:15 PM
722 Views
Tom, you pulled the "Say that to my face!" line. You lost the right to talk about respect. *NM*
- 12/12/2011 03:20:15 PM
773 Views
Once again, I really don't care what you think. *NM*
- 12/12/2011 03:37:40 PM
729 Views
Did I imply that you did? My apologies. I'd hate to insinuate that you'd stoop that low. *NM*
- 12/12/2011 04:13:25 PM
692 Views
As well read as you seem to be, you think you'd be smart enough...
- 11/12/2011 06:20:06 PM
1410 Views
I thought I have made it clear that I don't care if people don't like me here.
- 11/12/2011 08:44:58 PM
1330 Views
Re: I thought I have made it clear that I don't care if people don't like me here.
- 12/12/2011 04:04:37 PM
1380 Views
That statement has just confused me.
- 12/12/2011 04:06:53 PM
1345 Views
Re: That statement has just confused me.
- 12/12/2011 04:14:27 PM
1352 Views
I never learned Hittite. I had a book on pre-order for a long time but never ended up getting it.
- 12/12/2011 05:41:03 PM
1302 Views
What you have made clear, I think, is the fact that you deal in generalizations and stereotypes.
- 12/12/2011 10:12:12 PM
1453 Views
There's an unintentional irony in what you say, alas
- 13/12/2011 12:44:26 AM
1359 Views
Tom, Dick, or Larry...you may use your true first name, but you're still an anonymous entity to most
- 13/12/2011 04:49:35 AM
1577 Views
With such comeback skills, you must have ruled the playgrounds as a kid, no?
- 13/12/2011 05:21:42 AM
1583 Views
There are no special snowflakes, are there?
- 11/12/2011 09:39:21 PM
1334 Views
- 11/12/2011 09:39:21 PM
1334 Views
There are many way of widening one's horizons and broadening one's mind.
- 11/12/2011 10:08:24 PM
1090 Views
I said as much in my comment
- 11/12/2011 10:20:03 PM
1367 Views
What I don't like-
- 12/12/2011 04:28:55 AM
1447 Views
Why don't you name something, then?
- 12/12/2011 04:40:29 AM
1390 Views
Sure.
- 13/12/2011 07:30:56 AM
1225 Views
Mentioning Ender's Game pretty much shot your argument in the foot.
- 13/12/2011 02:02:59 PM
1339 Views
You dismiss the entire video game medium because many games lack value.
- 13/12/2011 03:59:11 PM
1477 Views
You're like the McDonald's paid advocate trying to say Big Macs are actually healthy.
- 13/12/2011 05:46:37 PM
1288 Views
I'll leave it up to others to define as they wish against their self-conceptions of me 
- 10/12/2011 10:52:54 AM
1436 Views
- 10/12/2011 10:52:54 AM
1436 Views
that's alright. I really have no desire to stroke your twit-ego. *NM*
- 10/12/2011 04:36:56 PM
578 Views
Considering the firestorm I appear to have touched off, that may be best.
- 12/12/2011 12:57:49 PM
1435 Views
I know, John
- 12/12/2011 04:27:04 PM
1324 Views
Re: I know, John
- 12/12/2011 05:06:26 PM
1377 Views
As I've said in the past, I'd be scared if anyone agreed with me anywhere approaching 100%
- 12/12/2011 06:33:52 PM
1319 Views
- 12/12/2011 06:33:52 PM
1319 Views
Re: As I've said in the past, I'd be scared if anyone agreed with me anywhere approaching 100%
- 12/12/2011 07:13:37 PM
1399 Views
- 12/12/2011 07:13:37 PM
1399 Views
Blurbs are not generally very original in their comparisons - would kind of defeat their purpose.
- 09/12/2011 10:42:17 PM
1418 Views
Maybe if so much of the genre weren't crap derivative works it wouldn't be so common. *NM*
- 11/12/2011 03:44:24 AM
701 Views
To be fair, a lot of it isn't.
- 11/12/2011 04:06:07 AM
1357 Views
I suspect that if it really isn't derivative it's not being compared to Tolkien in the first place.
- 11/12/2011 04:18:57 AM
1313 Views
That's true.
- 11/12/2011 11:08:01 AM
1303 Views
But see, that's where things start to get referred back to Tolkien.
- 12/12/2011 04:30:12 AM
1453 Views
The Tolkien fanaticism gets old. And yes, for me it is unreadable.
- 11/12/2011 11:37:53 PM
1366 Views
No, because the movies are very contemporary and relevant, thus he will remain so for quite a while.
- 12/12/2011 03:14:53 AM
1425 Views
Disagree all you want, but LotR is still the touchstone when it comes to works of fantasy.
- 12/12/2011 03:48:20 AM
1333 Views