Active Users:3881 Time:03/05/2026 12:58:23 PM
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. Fred Gaidin Send a noteboard - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM
Is that because you get confused when you don't? Or is it because you don't want to read other books when you are into one?


Reading is something I generally do methodically. Focus on one task (or book) until it is completed. All though I didn't mention the cases above, there are occasions when a new book will come out and I'll stop reading one book in favor of the new book. An example of this will likely occur when the new WoT book is released. However, usually when I decide to read a book, it is the one off the shelf that is most appealling to me at the time. If my interest begins to decline, I tell me self that I have to finish it in order to start the next book. Rarely is a book so bad that I feel that I must just get away from it for a while (like in the case of The Redemption of Althalus).
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 2013 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1738 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1500 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1704 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1598 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1710 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1599 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1626 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1598 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1562 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1628 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1400 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1601 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1587 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1707 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1507 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1559 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1496 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1622 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1620 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1459 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1541 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1470 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1626 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1462 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1588 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1539 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1557 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1515 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1496 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1478 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1552 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1570 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1996 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1556 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1641 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1484 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1585 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1482 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1531 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1520 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 763 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1521 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1561 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1594 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1541 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1592 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1593 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1421 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1565 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1513 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1602 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1671 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1515 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1468 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1513 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 644 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1424 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1406 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1506 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1380 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1477 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1642 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1424 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1711 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1891 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1672 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1565 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1542 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 747 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1508 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1588 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1623 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1404 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1387 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1440 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1609 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1560 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1405 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1504 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1531 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1668 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1434 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1602 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1506 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1479 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1520 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1497 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1532 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1579 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1523 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1719 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1508 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1649 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1525 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1579 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1638 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1491 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1406 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1659 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1595 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1465 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1355 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1617 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1497 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1567 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1650 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1577 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1657 Views

Reply to Message