Active Users:2267 Time:01/08/2026 11:30:04 PM
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. Fred Gaidin Send a noteboard - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM
Is that because you get confused when you don't? Or is it because you don't want to read other books when you are into one?


Reading is something I generally do methodically. Focus on one task (or book) until it is completed. All though I didn't mention the cases above, there are occasions when a new book will come out and I'll stop reading one book in favor of the new book. An example of this will likely occur when the new WoT book is released. However, usually when I decide to read a book, it is the one off the shelf that is most appealling to me at the time. If my interest begins to decline, I tell me self that I have to finish it in order to start the next book. Rarely is a book so bad that I feel that I must just get away from it for a while (like in the case of The Redemption of Althalus).
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 2076 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1817 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1558 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1768 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1649 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1774 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1657 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1683 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1663 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1611 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1682 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1462 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1657 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1643 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1774 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1569 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1613 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1554 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1694 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1676 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1508 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1599 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1523 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1691 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1526 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1642 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1593 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1620 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1576 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1558 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1539 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1620 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1636 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 2050 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1620 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1706 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1551 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1652 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1539 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1594 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1582 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 796 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1585 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1616 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1654 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1612 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1656 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1657 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1486 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1624 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1573 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1663 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1733 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1574 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1516 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1567 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 682 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1479 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1472 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1563 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1431 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1530 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1700 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1482 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1761 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1947 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1742 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1625 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1609 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 786 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1573 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1641 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1676 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1454 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1451 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1499 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1677 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1616 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1461 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1589 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1583 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1771 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1496 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1665 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1565 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1536 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1579 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1554 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1601 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1640 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1579 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1767 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1568 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1718 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1583 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1660 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1703 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1552 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1459 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1717 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1662 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1520 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1410 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1682 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1560 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1613 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1702 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1632 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1715 Views

Reply to Message