Active Users:421 Time:17/09/2025 08:31:52 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM
Parody is a valid form of "creative" work that doesn't usually infringe copyright. If it did, those hideous parodies like Date Movie and Scary Movie wouldn't exist.

The only way they'd have infringed copyright is if they'd used actual scenes from the films they parody - or for books, actual paragraphs from those books.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. Great Lord of Chaos - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1927 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1050 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? Aeryn - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 998 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 957 Views
That's not the point, though. Macharius - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 1039 Views
???? random thoughts - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 997 Views
Re: ???? Macharius - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 1042 Views
That isn't inspiration that wanting to use the popularity of the original to promote your work random thoughts - 05/01/2012 05:04:25 PM 1006 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* random thoughts - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 541 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* Vivien - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 687 Views
I don't get it. Palatine - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1288 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. Aeryn - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1089 Views
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM 1052 Views
I'm fairly sure the Jane Austen parodies do in fact use actual paragraphs... no? *NM* Legolas - 04/01/2012 10:31:32 PM 575 Views
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM 986 Views
Precisely the point. Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:45:01 PM 985 Views
Yes, they take tons of text from actual books. Contrast this with Ms. Rowling's reaction. *NM* Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:01:46 PM 454 Views
If there's zero chance of needing a lawyer at some point, it's way more likely to actually happen. Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:43:23 PM 1080 Views
Regarding quotes or poem lines, they ask permission for those. Legolas - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 932 Views
Answering you specifically Palatine - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 999 Views
But that doesn't make sense. Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1194 Views
Here's the gist of it. Palatine - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 1022 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 1035 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. Palatine - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 940 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 1028 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. Palatine - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1469 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 966 Views
Why. Palatine - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1639 Views
That is a very confusing article. Legolas - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1118 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different Larry - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 1053 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? random thoughts - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 976 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 439 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... ranagrande - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1134 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 475 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... DomA - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 947 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want random thoughts - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 1003 Views
OK why is that even a point of argument? random thoughts - 06/01/2012 02:42:47 PM 974 Views
No incentive to make great new works if they can just keep re-releasing Lion King in 3D *NM* Aeryn - 06/01/2012 09:45:38 PM 522 Views
I'm a lot older than your five year old, but I'm not sure I disagree Tangled is better. Legolas - 06/01/2012 11:12:32 PM 1025 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* Larry - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1151 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 1022 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? Larry - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1118 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* DomA - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 1029 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you Larry - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1051 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway ranagrande - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1209 Views
Can you back that up? Vivien - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1156 Views
Re: Can you back that up? DomA - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 931 Views
Artist/Singers used to *always* be on tour in order to make a living. Vivien - 06/01/2012 09:34:44 PM 1233 Views
Re: the piracy issues ranagrande - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1140 Views
Book piracy Vivien - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1244 Views
corporations have always had rights random thoughts - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 991 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes