Active Users:1240 Time:04/10/2026 09:50:37 PM
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... DomA Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM
They copyright their designs of the characters, and the movie as a whole, and their screenplay. They don't own the original stories (which themselves were put in writing often bases on oral folklore elements). No one can go and make Cinderella 2 using Disney's designs. They can, and do, release their own take on Cinderella in various forms.



Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 2122 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1229 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 1190 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 1138 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 1213 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 1172 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 1216 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 632 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 793 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1485 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1272 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 1161 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1383 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 1198 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 1266 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 1132 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 1237 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1641 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 1142 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1805 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1306 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 1230 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 1163 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 526 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1305 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 559 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 1129 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 1203 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1335 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 1219 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1289 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 1229 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1243 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1416 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1347 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 1107 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1358 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1433 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 1177 Views

Reply to Message