Active Users:392 Time:16/05/2024 05:14:29 PM
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you Larry Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM
I just find myself wondering if the downside of the necessary protection of conglomerates and corporations like Disney, Warner Bros., Fox, etc. is that many works will never receive that posthumous "second wave" of popularity that comes from those "classics" editions that are so often associated with public domain works. Times have changed. I do support some limited expiration of copyright due to the factor I note above, but at the same time I'm realistic and note that there's no way in this world that Disney's copyrights could ever lapse without a huge amount of turmoil and confusion. I just wonder if there may be a middle ground somewhere where a lifetime+70/95 after initial publication may be applicable in single-creator works and something more indefinite when multiple rights/signed-away rights are concerned.

As someone who has two copyrighted works that won't expire until at least the last quarter of the 21st century (and hopefully into the 22nd), it would be nice if by some miracle my translations made enough royalties to provide some income for myself and any relatives...but I think it'd be odd if it were to go to the fourth or fifth generation born after my death.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1752 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 888 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 816 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 822 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 872 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 842 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 872 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 478 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 615 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1107 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 915 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 851 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 998 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 847 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 880 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 792 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 877 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1269 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 805 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1419 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 930 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 869 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 815 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 368 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 960 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 405 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 800 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 843 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 967 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 869 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 962 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 864 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 897 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1036 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 986 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 786 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 971 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1075 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 838 Views

Reply to Message