Active Users:307 Time:08/07/2025 11:01:10 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I'm a lot older than your five year old, but I'm not sure I disagree Tangled is better. Legolas Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 11:12:32 PM
They have done a lot that is better than the classics it is just that they are not classics yet. My five year old would rather watch Tangled then Snow White and isn't she the target audience regardless of what a bunch of adults think about the classics?

Snow White is a classic because it's the first, but apart from the evil stepmother and a few iconic scenes, it's not really that great a movie. While Tangled was surprisingly good.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. Great Lord of Chaos - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1904 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1029 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? Aeryn - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 958 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 931 Views
That's not the point, though. Macharius - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 1014 Views
???? random thoughts - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 976 Views
Re: ???? Macharius - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 1020 Views
That isn't inspiration that wanting to use the popularity of the original to promote your work random thoughts - 05/01/2012 05:04:25 PM 986 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* random thoughts - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 529 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* Vivien - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 676 Views
I don't get it. Palatine - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1246 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. Aeryn - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1047 Views
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM 1028 Views
I'm fairly sure the Jane Austen parodies do in fact use actual paragraphs... no? *NM* Legolas - 04/01/2012 10:31:32 PM 543 Views
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM 964 Views
Precisely the point. Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:45:01 PM 965 Views
Yes, they take tons of text from actual books. Contrast this with Ms. Rowling's reaction. *NM* Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:01:46 PM 441 Views
If there's zero chance of needing a lawyer at some point, it's way more likely to actually happen. Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:43:23 PM 1062 Views
Regarding quotes or poem lines, they ask permission for those. Legolas - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 908 Views
Answering you specifically Palatine - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 978 Views
But that doesn't make sense. Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1150 Views
Here's the gist of it. Palatine - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 977 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 1011 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. Palatine - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 921 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 1003 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. Palatine - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1413 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 945 Views
Why. Palatine - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1618 Views
That is a very confusing article. Legolas - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1077 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different Larry - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 1005 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? random thoughts - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 955 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 425 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... ranagrande - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1113 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 465 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... DomA - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 927 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want random thoughts - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 984 Views
OK why is that even a point of argument? random thoughts - 06/01/2012 02:42:47 PM 955 Views
No incentive to make great new works if they can just keep re-releasing Lion King in 3D *NM* Aeryn - 06/01/2012 09:45:38 PM 512 Views
I'm a lot older than your five year old, but I'm not sure I disagree Tangled is better. Legolas - 06/01/2012 11:12:32 PM 1004 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* Larry - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1107 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 1003 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? Larry - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1095 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* DomA - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 1010 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you Larry - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1031 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway ranagrande - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1184 Views
Can you back that up? Vivien - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1129 Views
Re: Can you back that up? DomA - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 911 Views
Artist/Singers used to *always* be on tour in order to make a living. Vivien - 06/01/2012 09:34:44 PM 1213 Views
Re: the piracy issues ranagrande - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1119 Views
Book piracy Vivien - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1219 Views
corporations have always had rights random thoughts - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 967 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes