Active Users:3064 Time:02/07/2026 12:09:58 PM
In a sense, aren't they already? Larry Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM


In all seriousness, I think that should be something that ought to be changed as a compromise of sorts. Otherwise, works by dead 4x great-grandfathers still being part of copyright and possibly estate lawsuits (which are more frequent than some realize) would be the case. Not quite what the original copyright laws of the 19th century had in mind when they aimed to protect the living authors and not those who would be born after his grandchildren had died off. I think 70 years after author death is a good range, but I will also admit that corporations should have different protections since that is the heart and soul of their existence.


I don't think corporations should have more rights than people. It's one thing to claim they're people and get people's rights but what winds up happening is they get substantially preferential treatment, which is ridiculous and harmful. That would certainly stifle creativity.


I didn't say anything about "more rights." I'm just being sanguine about this, realizing that likely copyright protections will be extended indefinitely when the copyright holders are corporations.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 2078 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1191 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 1149 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 1099 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 1175 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 1135 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 1180 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 607 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 766 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1447 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1232 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 1126 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1326 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 1150 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 1212 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 1093 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 1192 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1603 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 1100 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1768 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1257 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 1187 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 1118 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 501 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1262 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 537 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 1083 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 1152 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1288 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 1177 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1249 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 1176 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1195 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1371 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1298 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 1070 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1308 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1386 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 1136 Views

Reply to Message