Active Users:446 Time:02/05/2025 11:32:47 AM
In a sense, aren't they already? Larry Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM


In all seriousness, I think that should be something that ought to be changed as a compromise of sorts. Otherwise, works by dead 4x great-grandfathers still being part of copyright and possibly estate lawsuits (which are more frequent than some realize) would be the case. Not quite what the original copyright laws of the 19th century had in mind when they aimed to protect the living authors and not those who would be born after his grandchildren had died off. I think 70 years after author death is a good range, but I will also admit that corporations should have different protections since that is the heart and soul of their existence.


I don't think corporations should have more rights than people. It's one thing to claim they're people and get people's rights but what winds up happening is they get substantially preferential treatment, which is ridiculous and harmful. That would certainly stifle creativity.


I didn't say anything about "more rights." I'm just being sanguine about this, realizing that likely copyright protections will be extended indefinitely when the copyright holders are corporations.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1873 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1004 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 931 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 908 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 987 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 955 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 991 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 520 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 664 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1217 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1020 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 957 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1126 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 949 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 988 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 897 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 984 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1388 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 923 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1531 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1047 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 976 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 931 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 417 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1089 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 455 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 903 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 960 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1080 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 978 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1069 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 985 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1005 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1157 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1103 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 888 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1087 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1194 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 938 Views

Reply to Message