Active Users:458 Time:02/05/2025 11:06:16 AM
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you Larry Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM
I just find myself wondering if the downside of the necessary protection of conglomerates and corporations like Disney, Warner Bros., Fox, etc. is that many works will never receive that posthumous "second wave" of popularity that comes from those "classics" editions that are so often associated with public domain works. Times have changed. I do support some limited expiration of copyright due to the factor I note above, but at the same time I'm realistic and note that there's no way in this world that Disney's copyrights could ever lapse without a huge amount of turmoil and confusion. I just wonder if there may be a middle ground somewhere where a lifetime+70/95 after initial publication may be applicable in single-creator works and something more indefinite when multiple rights/signed-away rights are concerned.

As someone who has two copyrighted works that won't expire until at least the last quarter of the 21st century (and hopefully into the 22nd), it would be nice if by some miracle my translations made enough royalties to provide some income for myself and any relatives...but I think it'd be odd if it were to go to the fourth or fifth generation born after my death.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1873 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1004 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 930 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 907 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 987 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 955 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 991 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 519 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 664 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1217 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1020 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 957 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1126 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 949 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 988 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 897 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 984 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1387 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 923 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1530 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1046 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 975 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 931 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 416 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1088 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 455 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 903 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 960 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1079 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 978 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1068 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 984 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1005 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1156 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1103 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 887 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1087 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1194 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 938 Views

Reply to Message