Good points- piracy is positively correlated with sales.
Now for books- it's a different industry but in the end piracy is still correlated with greater exposure, which is gonna mean sales. There were even some stories earlier this year of authors illegally uploading their own books, in hopes of greater exposure. Found one, it's linked.
In terms of pirating books, I think the most common scenario is a person who already supports the author and owns the physical book (possibly more than one copy!) but upon getting a e-reader and enjoying the convenience of reading on it, wants to read the book he/she already owns on the ereader. Many people who buy books a lot will have a backlog of books they need to read and they feel like they shouldn't buy books until they've read the books they already own. Now, if it's easier to read the book on the ereader, they'll get through the backlog of books faster and be buying more books sooner. I know it's definitely illegal but I don't think it's wrong to download an ebook version of a book you already own.
It's not the kind of thing where you're going to read 1 book a month, regardless of how you obtained it. The more people read, the faster they read and the more they read and the more they anticipate books by their favorite authors and the likelier they are to spend even more money on books. If you discover a new favorite author via piracy and the new book comes out, you've gonna want it immediately or even before that you may want to buy more books by that author, possibly including the book you've already downloaded. People do want to obtain things the "official" way. Even though it's actually easier to download books, somehow getting ebooks from public libraries is very popular. (To the extent that publishers are freaking out about it!)
Now for books- it's a different industry but in the end piracy is still correlated with greater exposure, which is gonna mean sales. There were even some stories earlier this year of authors illegally uploading their own books, in hopes of greater exposure. Found one, it's linked.
In terms of pirating books, I think the most common scenario is a person who already supports the author and owns the physical book (possibly more than one copy!) but upon getting a e-reader and enjoying the convenience of reading on it, wants to read the book he/she already owns on the ereader. Many people who buy books a lot will have a backlog of books they need to read and they feel like they shouldn't buy books until they've read the books they already own. Now, if it's easier to read the book on the ereader, they'll get through the backlog of books faster and be buying more books sooner. I know it's definitely illegal but I don't think it's wrong to download an ebook version of a book you already own.
It's not the kind of thing where you're going to read 1 book a month, regardless of how you obtained it. The more people read, the faster they read and the more they read and the more they anticipate books by their favorite authors and the likelier they are to spend even more money on books. If you discover a new favorite author via piracy and the new book comes out, you've gonna want it immediately or even before that you may want to buy more books by that author, possibly including the book you've already downloaded. People do want to obtain things the "official" way. Even though it's actually easier to download books, somehow getting ebooks from public libraries is very popular. (To the extent that publishers are freaking out about it!)
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D.
- 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM
1979 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public.
- 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM
1095 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works?
- 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM
1051 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc.
- 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM
998 Views
That's not the point, though.
- 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM
1083 Views
????
- 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM
1038 Views
Re: ????
- 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM
1083 Views
That isn't inspiration that wanting to use the popularity of the original to promote your work
- 05/01/2012 05:04:25 PM
1043 Views
I don't get it.
- 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM
1335 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain.
- 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM
1132 Views
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright.
- 04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM
1095 Views
I'm fairly sure the Jane Austen parodies do in fact use actual paragraphs... no? *NM*
- 04/01/2012 10:31:32 PM
605 Views
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others.
- 04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM
1026 Views
Yes, they take tons of text from actual books. Contrast this with Ms. Rowling's reaction. *NM*
- 05/01/2012 07:01:46 PM
473 Views
If there's zero chance of needing a lawyer at some point, it's way more likely to actually happen.
- 04/01/2012 10:43:23 PM
1118 Views
Answering you specifically
- 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM
1034 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway)
- 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM
1092 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though.
- 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM
989 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though.
- 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM
1004 Views
That is a very confusing article.
- 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM
1162 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different
- 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM
1088 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies?
- 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM
1019 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM*
- 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM
460 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics...
- 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM
1172 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM*
- 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM
496 Views
OK why is that even a point of argument?
- 06/01/2012 02:42:47 PM
1013 Views
No incentive to make great new works if they can just keep re-releasing Lion King in 3D *NM*
- 06/01/2012 09:45:38 PM
554 Views
I'm a lot older than your five year old, but I'm not sure I disagree Tangled is better.
- 06/01/2012 11:12:32 PM
1060 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug*
- 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM
1188 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug*
- 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM
1076 Views
Can you back that up?
- 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM
1195 Views
Re: Can you back that up?
- 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM
973 Views
Artist/Singers used to *always* be on tour in order to make a living.
- 06/01/2012 09:34:44 PM
1288 Views
Re: the piracy issues
- 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM
1207 Views
Book piracy
- 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM
1287 Views
