Active Users:411 Time:02/05/2025 11:41:42 AM
Book piracy Vivien Send a noteboard - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM
Good points- piracy is positively correlated with sales.

Now for books- it's a different industry but in the end piracy is still correlated with greater exposure, which is gonna mean sales. There were even some stories earlier this year of authors illegally uploading their own books, in hopes of greater exposure. Found one, it's linked.

In terms of pirating books, I think the most common scenario is a person who already supports the author and owns the physical book (possibly more than one copy!) but upon getting a e-reader and enjoying the convenience of reading on it, wants to read the book he/she already owns on the ereader. Many people who buy books a lot will have a backlog of books they need to read and they feel like they shouldn't buy books until they've read the books they already own. Now, if it's easier to read the book on the ereader, they'll get through the backlog of books faster and be buying more books sooner. I know it's definitely illegal but I don't think it's wrong to download an ebook version of a book you already own.

It's not the kind of thing where you're going to read 1 book a month, regardless of how you obtained it. The more people read, the faster they read and the more they read and the more they anticipate books by their favorite authors and the likelier they are to spend even more money on books. If you discover a new favorite author via piracy and the new book comes out, you've gonna want it immediately or even before that you may want to buy more books by that author, possibly including the book you've already downloaded. People do want to obtain things the "official" way. Even though it's actually easier to download books, somehow getting ebooks from public libraries is very popular. (To the extent that publishers are freaking out about it!)
Authors pirating their own books
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1874 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1004 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 931 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 908 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 988 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 955 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 991 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 520 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 665 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1217 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1020 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 957 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1126 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 949 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 988 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 897 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 984 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1388 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 924 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1531 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1047 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 976 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 931 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 417 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1089 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 456 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 903 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 960 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1080 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 979 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1069 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 985 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1005 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1157 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1103 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 888 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1088 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1195 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 939 Views

Reply to Message