Active Users:161 Time:17/05/2024 06:57:17 AM
I rather agree with you DomA Send a noteboard - 21/03/2012 10:09:01 PM
I don't think it's these guys' contention that Dante was particularly Islamophobic, anti-Semitic, homophobic or offensive by the standards of his time (indeed, that would have been a rather difficult thesis to defend even if he'd been still worse than he is). Their point is that those passages are all those things by modern standards, and that Italian education rather fails at putting them in their proper historical perspective. Which, as I noted elsewhere, is of course not a statement that we can easily verify.

(...)

There is certainly something gratuitous about this thing in the way they thrive off the publicity created by the suggestion of removing Dante from the compulsory curriculum. An intentional provocation to guarantee them media attention for their rather less revolutionary goals.


We can't go verify anything (at least until/unless a credible source comes to the defense of the book on the curriculum - it's the sort of controversy, if it doesn't die fast, that might well attract the attention of Eco), but it's also well known Italy have had and is still having social problems related to xenophobia and racism (and there's many Italians who ressent a lot the influence the CC still has on public life)

Dante's book is a medieval classic and one of the monuments of Italian culture. However, it's far from the only one the education system can choose to focus on, and it's a perfectly legitimate opinion to question the wisdom of leaving a book like this on the curriculum in the current socio-political climate, and considering modern values.

It's also a perfectly valid opinion that the book ought to stay on the curriculum, but the way it's presented changes to take into account the modern values and the fact far from all students nowadays are catholics - that the aspects of the book that can be construed as dubious or risqué within an education system that aim to promote anti-racism or religious prejudices. That book was always meant to be provocative and offensive and it has salvoes for everyone, really. Many would argue that placing works like the Divine Comedy that could be construed as racist/xenophobic in the closet is hardly the right way to teach the right values to today's students (Eco notably would likely be of that opinion). Ironically, the way this groups attacks Dante is rather similar to the way some Italian Rabbi and a Catholic theologian writing for the OR attacked Eco's latest novel.

If in the education system the DC is taught merely for its artistic/literay value and no effort at all are made to address some of the values it carries and why and how they differ from modern ones, I can understand why its presence on the curriculum could irritate a lot some progressists.

As for their ridiculous mediatic controversy and virulent (and in many places misguided or vicious) attacks at the catholic culture/values in there... well, that's Italy for you. This sounds very much not like a rationally presented, temperate attempt to have the book removed from the curriculum so much as a call to arms to all those in favour of laicity in Italian civil life and to shake their complacency by appealing to emotions and outrage. Very populist...

Every time a controversy like this arises in Italy it always seems to turn into this sort of mud fight, especially when it concerns religious issues or the CC. Militant atheists or promoters of laicity there seem compelled to turn into rabid dogs, and the Catholic defenders are hardly more temperate in their opinions. There's a serious lack of moderation and rationality from both sides. It's always weird/funny to watching this from outside the Italian society.



This message last edited by DomA on 21/03/2012 at 10:10:12 PM
Reply to message
Divine Comedy is "offensive and discriminatory", says Italian NGO - 20/03/2012 07:25:08 PM 1284 Views
Duh? - 20/03/2012 07:38:41 PM 742 Views
It does kind of feel like we should know more about how it's taught in Italian schools. - 20/03/2012 07:50:36 PM 676 Views
The most ignorant statement of the day. - 21/03/2012 04:48:39 PM 1099 Views
Re: The most ignorant statement of the day. - 21/03/2012 07:42:54 PM 698 Views
Isn't the fundamental basis of Christanity mutually exclusive to Judaism and Islam? - 20/03/2012 08:33:51 PM 662 Views
That's a really good point that I hadn't considered. I agree. *NM* - 22/03/2012 09:05:00 AM 300 Views
Excellent point. - 22/03/2012 11:44:36 PM 1313 Views
I don't see why that would be the case - 23/03/2012 01:44:49 AM 723 Views
Just because someone is in Hell doesn't mean you should discriminate against them - 20/03/2012 08:23:22 PM 804 Views
Not having read any Dante is kind of hurting my ability to reply to that. - 20/03/2012 10:08:52 PM 1035 Views
Odd, considering you linked the "offending passages" - 20/03/2012 11:54:34 PM 713 Views
Yes, well, I was semi-serious with the "pretending to understand Italian". - 21/03/2012 07:58:35 PM 691 Views
I rather agree with you - 21/03/2012 10:09:01 PM 861 Views
The last part of Hell is Giudecca because of Judas. - 21/03/2012 10:30:36 PM 774 Views
And you don't see what's offensive about that? - 21/03/2012 11:11:16 PM 664 Views
It was only a matter of time. I wonder, when will it end? - 20/03/2012 08:42:42 PM 1027 Views
I saw that. Seems a little misguided - 21/03/2012 07:04:06 AM 678 Views
That's the understatement of the year. - 21/03/2012 01:23:14 PM 676 Views
I think that sometimes people take "politicly correct" tooooo far... *NM* - 21/03/2012 08:20:31 AM 394 Views
Dante was also anit-italian by there logic. - 21/03/2012 04:53:50 PM 747 Views
It is the nature of comedy to be offensive. - 21/03/2012 08:42:09 PM 930 Views
Let me sum up my opinion on this as succinctly and clearly as I can: - 21/03/2012 11:50:37 PM 656 Views

Reply to Message