Considering that I readily admit that I enjoy kitsch and that pro wrestling is certainly that, I would have to say that my standards don't really change when shifting from pro wrestling to book reviewing

Except that whenever you review or speak to a book, if it isn't high literature, you say that it is not a good book. You do not apply the same sort of standards.
Wrestling can be good, simply because people enjoy it. A movie can be bgood, simply because people enjoy it. Twinkies are good because people like them. However, for you, a book/story can never be good simply because people like it...
Because I rarely use the words "good" or "bad" when commenting on stories from a variety of genres, instead preferring to compare strengths and weaknesses without resorting to binary labels. But feel free to read through the hundreds of reviews I've published there since 2007, if you want
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
This may be one of the most dire reviews you shall ever read
- 09/09/2012 09:12:25 PM
2313 Views
A review of a D&D bestiary could be more dire.
- 09/09/2012 11:29:17 PM
1407 Views
Perhaps
- 09/09/2012 11:50:20 PM
1502 Views
They are popular as they are fun, easy reading books
- 10/09/2012 12:11:24 AM
1490 Views
"Popular", "Fun," and "Easy" doesn't have to be equated with poorly-written
- 10/09/2012 12:16:27 AM
1718 Views
Poorly written by what standard?
- 10/09/2012 12:29:17 AM
1577 Views
By the standards of what I enjoyed as a nine year-old?
- 10/09/2012 01:04:12 AM
1526 Views
So like I said, by the standards of Elitist Literary Snobs
- 11/09/2012 12:03:08 AM
1593 Views
Nice attempt at sophistry, but alas, it fails
- 11/09/2012 12:38:24 AM
1548 Views
Was that meant to make any sense?
- 11/09/2012 01:43:13 AM
1732 Views
Re: Was that meant to make any sense?
- 11/09/2012 01:54:23 AM
1538 Views
I'm with Wibble on this (big surprise)
- 12/09/2012 03:07:53 PM
1623 Views
Heh.
- 12/09/2012 03:43:52 PM
1757 Views
Pretty much so
- 12/09/2012 04:19:35 PM
1713 Views
When did you put up that header?
- 12/09/2012 04:35:20 PM
1541 Views
I didn't put it up
- 12/09/2012 04:51:32 PM
1452 Views
I shall tread lightly so.
- 12/09/2012 06:15:51 PM
1565 Views
- 12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM
1410 Views
- 12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM
1410 Views
Re: Pretty much so
- 12/09/2012 08:50:57 PM
1574 Views
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much
- 12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM
1596 Views
Actually, I read them almost never
- 13/09/2012 03:07:48 PM
1594 Views
I think my IQ dropped a little bit when I parsed what you said
- 13/09/2012 04:16:21 PM
1574 Views
Yep, your usual rebuttal... *NM*
- 17/09/2012 02:14:56 PM
790 Views
No, not really
- 17/09/2012 06:25:15 PM
1397 Views
Yes, Yes, wrap yourself in arrogance and declare yourself correct until your opposite gets bored...
- 17/09/2012 11:12:17 PM
1693 Views
Don't try to argue with them. They've made their judgments. They are better than you.
- 10/09/2012 09:36:17 PM
1516 Views
Defensive much?
*NM*
- 10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM
837 Views
*NM*
- 10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM
837 Views
Perhaps. It's annoying, because I tend to agree with you guys - you and Tom and Stephen.
- 11/09/2012 02:32:28 AM
1512 Views
The odd thing that there wasn't any belittling on my part -see other response. *NM*
- 11/09/2012 03:17:36 AM
751 Views
For the record, I wasn't trying to be condescending in my response.
- 11/09/2012 05:52:29 PM
1527 Views
He never said you couldn't enjoy it.
- 10/09/2012 11:10:11 PM
1643 Views
He also went on to compare liking the books to having the standards of a nine-year-old.
- 11/09/2012 02:34:18 AM
1506 Views
You didn't read what I said very well then
- 11/09/2012 03:16:21 AM
1501 Views
You're right. In the context of this thread, I'm basically acting like a raving lunatic.
- 11/09/2012 02:48:19 PM
1541 Views
It's not like any of us have ever been innocent 100% of the time
- 11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM
1521 Views
- 11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM
1521 Views
I believe that they were not meant for adults.
- 10/09/2012 12:30:05 AM
1527 Views
Very few of my friends were reading the books; some played the game, though
- 10/09/2012 01:06:07 AM
1499 Views
Basically, both get dubious kudos for trying something new by the dire standards of the day.
- 10/09/2012 11:38:22 PM
1561 Views
Interesting point
- 11/09/2012 12:41:01 AM
1499 Views
Are you aware of the game's alignment rules? Some of the novels struggle with this.
- 12/09/2012 10:58:37 PM
1562 Views
Not aware of it at all until now
- 12/09/2012 11:18:57 PM
1524 Views
How is that possible?
- 12/09/2012 11:28:33 PM
1481 Views
My dad was (and is) influenced by Evangelicals
- 13/09/2012 12:17:36 AM
1414 Views
Wait, so you didn't read the Chronicles first?
- 13/09/2012 02:12:13 PM
1415 Views
No
- 13/09/2012 02:18:03 PM
1478 Views
Chronicles is considerably weaker
- 13/09/2012 11:14:38 PM
1504 Views
Needless to say, once I finish reading the Icewind Dale trilogy, I'm done with D&D
- 14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM
1665 Views
- 14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM
1665 Views
These threads are so much better than the rape threads! *NM*
- 12/09/2012 04:03:01 AM
863 Views
You're just waiting to see if I'll use hexameter in the next one
*NM*
- 12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM
687 Views
*NM*
- 12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM
687 Views
And having now finished Dragonlance: Legends, its very own sonnet
- 13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM
1492 Views
- 13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM
1492 Views
At least you didn't read the Baldur's Gate novelizations
- 14/09/2012 04:29:17 AM
1441 Views
Sssssh!
- 14/09/2012 05:10:19 AM
1490 Views
Baldurs Gate wooooo!
- 14/09/2012 04:13:34 PM
1607 Views
Eh, Star Wars Expanded Universe I could see reading. Some of them are supposed to be good
- 17/09/2012 04:37:05 PM
1862 Views
Is the review dire because of the subject or the sonnet form?
- 14/09/2012 04:24:37 PM
1544 Views
Both
- 14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM
1470 Views
- 14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM
1470 Views
it would be unusual for someone to just randomly pick books like that up
- 14/09/2012 05:05:37 PM
1762 Views
Interesting scenario
- 14/09/2012 10:16:11 PM
1461 Views
