Active Users:507 Time:18/09/2026 05:22:39 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much Larry Send a noteboard - 12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM

Considering that I readily admit that I enjoy kitsch and that pro wrestling is certainly that, I would have to say that my standards don't really change when shifting from pro wrestling to book reviewing ;)


Except that whenever you review or speak to a book, if it isn't high literature, you say that it is not a good book. You do not apply the same sort of standards.

Wrestling can be good, simply because people enjoy it. A movie can be bgood, simply because people enjoy it. Twinkies are good because people like them. However, for you, a book/story can never be good simply because people like it...


Because I rarely use the words "good" or "bad" when commenting on stories from a variety of genres, instead preferring to compare strengths and weaknesses without resorting to binary labels. But feel free to read through the hundreds of reviews I've published there since 2007, if you want ;)
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
This may be one of the most dire reviews you shall ever read Larry - 09/09/2012 09:12:25 PM 2497 Views
Certainly one of the most original, you get points for that. Legolas - 09/09/2012 10:39:00 PM 1728 Views
Well... Larry - 09/09/2012 10:57:25 PM 1738 Views
A review of a D&D bestiary could be more dire. Stephen - 09/09/2012 11:29:17 PM 1570 Views
Perhaps Larry - 09/09/2012 11:50:20 PM 1662 Views
Hey now. Owlbears are awesome. lord-of-shadow - 11/09/2012 02:35:28 AM 1926 Views
That page is painful to behold Stephen - 11/09/2012 03:09:29 AM 1669 Views
They are popular as they are fun, easy reading books Wibble - 10/09/2012 12:11:24 AM 1652 Views
"Popular", "Fun," and "Easy" doesn't have to be equated with poorly-written Larry - 10/09/2012 12:16:27 AM 1884 Views
Poorly written by what standard? Wibble - 10/09/2012 12:29:17 AM 1738 Views
By the standards of what I enjoyed as a nine year-old? Larry - 10/09/2012 01:04:12 AM 1714 Views
So like I said, by the standards of Elitist Literary Snobs Wibble - 11/09/2012 12:03:08 AM 1768 Views
Nice attempt at sophistry, but alas, it fails Larry - 11/09/2012 12:38:24 AM 1715 Views
Was that meant to make any sense? Wibble - 11/09/2012 01:43:13 AM 1914 Views
Re: Was that meant to make any sense? Larry - 11/09/2012 01:54:23 AM 1702 Views
I'm with Wibble on this (big surprise) HyogaRott - 12/09/2012 03:07:53 PM 1775 Views
Heh. James - 12/09/2012 03:43:52 PM 1934 Views
Pretty much so Larry - 12/09/2012 04:19:35 PM 1887 Views
When did you put up that header? Stephen - 12/09/2012 04:35:20 PM 1706 Views
I didn't put it up Larry - 12/09/2012 04:51:32 PM 1618 Views
I shall tread lightly so. Stephen - 12/09/2012 06:15:51 PM 1736 Views
Larry - 12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM 1594 Views
+6 health? What game are you playing? Tom - 12/09/2012 07:52:52 PM 1635 Views
The Game of Life? Larry - 12/09/2012 08:23:53 PM 1685 Views
Re: Pretty much so HyogaRott - 12/09/2012 08:50:57 PM 1727 Views
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much Larry - 12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM 1749 Views
Actually, I read them almost never HyogaRott - 13/09/2012 03:07:48 PM 1753 Views
I think my IQ dropped a little bit when I parsed what you said Larry - 13/09/2012 04:16:21 PM 1730 Views
Yep, your usual rebuttal... *NM* HyogaRott - 17/09/2012 02:14:56 PM 879 Views
No, not really Larry - 17/09/2012 06:25:15 PM 1570 Views
Yes, Yes, wrap yourself in arrogance and declare yourself correct until your opposite gets bored... HyogaRott - 17/09/2012 11:12:17 PM 1847 Views
Nah, I just wipe my ass with arrogance Larry - 18/09/2012 12:23:44 AM 2090 Views
The last word with me is rather difficult to obtain HyogaRott - 18/09/2012 02:48:03 PM 1669 Views
Don't try to argue with them. They've made their judgments. They are better than you. lord-of-shadow - 10/09/2012 09:36:17 PM 1670 Views
Defensive much? *NM* Larry - 10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM 911 Views
Perhaps. It's annoying, because I tend to agree with you guys - you and Tom and Stephen. lord-of-shadow - 11/09/2012 02:32:28 AM 1697 Views
The odd thing that there wasn't any belittling on my part -see other response. *NM* Larry - 11/09/2012 03:17:36 AM 843 Views
For the record, I wasn't trying to be condescending in my response. Tom - 11/09/2012 05:52:29 PM 1722 Views
He never said you couldn't enjoy it. Stephen - 10/09/2012 11:10:11 PM 1815 Views
Indeed Larry - 10/09/2012 11:17:20 PM 1657 Views
But they aren't. Wibble - 10/09/2012 11:48:14 PM 1699 Views
Prove it. *NM* Stephen - 11/09/2012 03:12:17 AM 854 Views
He also went on to compare liking the books to having the standards of a nine-year-old. lord-of-shadow - 11/09/2012 02:34:18 AM 1668 Views
You didn't read what I said very well then Larry - 11/09/2012 03:16:21 AM 1656 Views
You're right. In the context of this thread, I'm basically acting like a raving lunatic. lord-of-shadow - 11/09/2012 02:48:19 PM 1691 Views
It's not like any of us have ever been innocent 100% of the time Larry - 11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM 1672 Views
I believe that they were not meant for adults. Tom - 10/09/2012 12:30:05 AM 1699 Views
Very few of my friends were reading the books; some played the game, though Larry - 10/09/2012 01:06:07 AM 1664 Views
Basically, both get dubious kudos for trying something new by the dire standards of the day. Werthead - 10/09/2012 11:38:22 PM 1736 Views
Interesting point Larry - 11/09/2012 12:41:01 AM 1665 Views
Are you aware of the game's alignment rules? Some of the novels struggle with this. Werthead - 12/09/2012 10:58:37 PM 1723 Views
Not aware of it at all until now Larry - 12/09/2012 11:18:57 PM 1690 Views
How is that possible? Tom - 12/09/2012 11:28:33 PM 1660 Views
My dad was (and is) influenced by Evangelicals Larry - 13/09/2012 12:17:36 AM 1569 Views
Wait, so you didn't read the Chronicles first? Tom - 13/09/2012 02:12:13 PM 1583 Views
No Larry - 13/09/2012 02:18:03 PM 1646 Views
Well, it's sort of like starting Jordan at Lord of Chaos Tom - 13/09/2012 05:18:23 PM 1677 Views
Oddly enough, I started WoT at CoS in November 1997 Larry - 13/09/2012 05:56:04 PM 1588 Views
Chronicles is considerably weaker Werthead - 13/09/2012 11:14:38 PM 1692 Views
Needless to say, once I finish reading the Icewind Dale trilogy, I'm done with D&D Larry - 14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM 1813 Views
12 modules, not 15 Tom - 14/09/2012 02:55:39 PM 1847 Views
These threads are so much better than the rape threads! *NM* Dan - 12/09/2012 04:03:01 AM 946 Views
You're just waiting to see if I'll use hexameter in the next one *NM* Larry - 12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM 787 Views
When do we get to see some alexandrines? *NM* Stephen - 12/09/2012 12:41:29 PM 838 Views
Or quatrains? Larry - 12/09/2012 03:25:13 PM 1572 Views
And having now finished Dragonlance: Legends, its very own sonnet Larry - 13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM 1653 Views
At least you didn't read the Baldur's Gate novelizations beetnemesis - 14/09/2012 04:29:17 AM 1591 Views
Sssssh! Larry - 14/09/2012 05:10:19 AM 1646 Views
People become lesbians for no reason! beetnemesis - 17/09/2012 04:34:20 PM 1516 Views
I think my IQ dropped further upon learning of this Larry - 17/09/2012 06:29:29 PM 1542 Views
Baldurs Gate wooooo! Foxhead - 14/09/2012 04:13:34 PM 1781 Views
Eh, Star Wars Expanded Universe I could see reading. Some of them are supposed to be good beetnemesis - 17/09/2012 04:37:05 PM 2018 Views
Is the review dire because of the subject or the sonnet form? Foxhead - 14/09/2012 04:24:37 PM 1704 Views
Both Larry - 14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM 1615 Views
it would be unusual for someone to just randomly pick books like that up Foxhead - 14/09/2012 05:05:37 PM 1928 Views
Interesting scenario Larry - 14/09/2012 10:16:11 PM 1629 Views
Re: Interesting scenario Foxhead - 15/09/2012 09:55:59 AM 1881 Views
Re: Interesting scenario Larry - 17/09/2012 06:28:57 PM 1536 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes