Active Users:428 Time:16/06/2025 05:51:56 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. jh Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM
And that is for movies that have already made a profit and that the people have often already seen. I really don't see this as being that much different.


and I believe that most readers will look at it with the same eyes... the price of an ebook will need to be significantly lower in order to gain market shares over physical books at the moment. I am sure people will grow more friendly towards the concept of digital 'ownership' of objects but we are not there yet. The music business is going there faster, but it is easier to maintain a good quality product when you can get mp3-players for pocket money these days - most people still haven't used a reader, and that makes it more likely that they will dismiss the concept of digital purchases until they see an advantage with it - moving much or cheaper texts, whatever.

E-readers will however not be a big hit until the companies which runs them stop deleting things from them.
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices mapthis - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1422 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* kcf - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 447 Views
Why's that? Aemon - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 1038 Views
I sum it up here kcf - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1334 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. The Shrike - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 848 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly kcf - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 1070 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. The Shrike - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 792 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. everynametaken - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 931 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. Aemon - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 786 Views
thats a big part of it kcf - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1174 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* The Shrike - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 414 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* kcf - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 418 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. The Shrike - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 757 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* kcf - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 410 Views
Still, your overall point stands. The Shrike - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 773 Views
yep - apparently they read the move as a sign of weakness *NM* kcf - 01/02/2010 11:20:04 PM 465 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. The Shrike - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 769 Views
How easy is it to find books now? Rebekah - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 721 Views
Pretty easily, actually. The Shrike - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1154 Views
That's excellent. Rebekah - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 937 Views
Screens are good. Aemon - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 976 Views
Two words: Leather cover. The Shrike - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 836 Views
True, I do remember liking the cover. It's much nicer than what comes with the Sony. Aemon - 01/02/2010 09:02:56 PM 1006 Views
This is what I have. It sounds like what you have for your Sony. The Shrike - 01/02/2010 09:39:02 PM 1039 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. Aemon - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1170 Views
If you do like a lot of old books ranagrande - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 837 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. Aemon - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 917 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* everynametaken - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 464 Views
Agreed. *NM* Legolas - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 378 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. Aemon - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 759 Views
That's the thing, it's not. Legolas - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 790 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. Aemon - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 990 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. Ghavrel - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 745 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. everynametaken - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 923 Views
I don't know about that. Rebekah - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 822 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* Apsalar Shadowdancer - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 355 Views
Mass markets, yeah. nossy - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 749 Views
That is bananas. Elaine - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 781 Views
"Most newly released..." Aemon - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 1014 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray random thoughts - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 806 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. jh - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 946 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. Aemon - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 1009 Views
I really don't think it is that different random thoughts - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 796 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link kcf - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1154 Views
He makes good points... Ghavrel - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 790 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. everynametaken - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 814 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. lord-of-shadow - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 874 Views
Whaaa? Ghavrel - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 826 Views
Yes, of course. lord-of-shadow - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 919 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. Ghavrel - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 929 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* lord-of-shadow - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 404 Views
Oh, hush. Go sit in the corner and listen to your 8-track while the rest of us enjoy The Future. *NM* Aemon - 02/02/2010 02:37:33 PM 388 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* Ghavrel - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 341 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* lord-of-shadow - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 352 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. Ghavrel - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 723 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. lord-of-shadow - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 770 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* Ghavrel - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 337 Views
It will increase the number of books available random thoughts - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 1823 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. everynametaken - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 917 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services random thoughts - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 737 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. everynametaken - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 872 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. Ghavrel - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 727 Views
That would be awesome. lord-of-shadow - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 718 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. lord-of-shadow - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 1001 Views
Good Lord! *NM* everynametaken - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 342 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes