Active Users:2241 Time:18/06/2026 10:12:13 AM
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. everynametaken Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM
But the more people buying e-books, the less people buying real books. Obviously not a 1-to-1 relationship, but still. And even if it all ends up in the same publishing company, it doesn't end up in the pockets of the same retailers, and it effects which medium that publisher will emphasize in the future.

It's a bit of an oversimplification to think that a hit against the e-book industry is automatically a plus for traditional books, but the two are competing mediums.


Many people like myself will be quite happy to do away with paper books. I hate lugging them around, especially while traveling. In today's compact and on the go" world they are a waste of space. To seek the destruction of an emerging market because you are nostalgic toward traditional paper books is asinine.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1669 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 528 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 1187 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1509 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 1006 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 1230 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 949 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 1072 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 935 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1337 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 491 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 499 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 917 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 493 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 933 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 920 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 862 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1343 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 1116 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 1135 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 1002 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1330 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 995 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 1079 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 538 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 465 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 916 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 944 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 1145 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 904 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 1109 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 1010 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 427 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 924 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 941 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 1176 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 985 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 1093 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 1152 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 956 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1315 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 962 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 983 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 1030 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 993 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 1071 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 1081 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 472 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 415 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 435 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 901 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 931 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 410 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 4440 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 1076 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 925 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 1032 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 873 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 883 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 1146 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 418 Views

Reply to Message