Active Users:305 Time:29/04/2024 03:42:02 PM
Re: That's the thing, it's not. Aemon Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM
Well the article DID say "most newly released books" or whatever. I believe the 12-14 price is for novels that only exist in hardcover. And as to the additional cost, you're not paying for materials. Do you really think a cardboard case and glossy jacket cost the company 15-20 dollars more on a regular hardcover? No. It's a matter of economics, is all. Think of it in movie terms. When a movie first comes out you pay 10 bucks to see it in a theater. It's in demand, people want it, theaters/studios can charge more. Then when people don't want it as much, licensing fees go down, dollar theaters pick it up, etc.

Things always cost more when they're new. As they get less desirable, the price goes down, and is not always (or even usually) related to cost of materials. We're seeing the same thing here.
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1258 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 353 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 882 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1142 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 730 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 892 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 643 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 782 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 630 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 989 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 352 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 328 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 600 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 326 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 618 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 619 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 568 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 986 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 787 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 828 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 662 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1026 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 643 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 763 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 397 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 299 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 602 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 628 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 847 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 588 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 764 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 660 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 296 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 626 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 621 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 849 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 636 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 794 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 874 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 638 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 978 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 629 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 635 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 712 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 663 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 762 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 785 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 332 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 276 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 282 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 569 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 617 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 273 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 777 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 754 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 588 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 724 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 558 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 554 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 847 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 282 Views

Reply to Message