Active Users:499 Time:11/08/2026 01:12:47 PM
This is what I have. It sounds like what you have for your Sony. The Shrike Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 09:39:02 PM
If I remember right, though, it was pretty bulky, and wasn't attached to the kindle. It was just strapped in. . .or something, and not very well. I was worried that if I dropped it, the kindle would fall out on the way down. Anyway, you're right, it felt nice. It felt like reading a big, luxurious hardcover book or something. My Sony, on the other hand, has an attached cover, which is easy to hold book-style in two hands, or with the front part of the cover folded back, in one hand. It feels more like a light, comfortable paperback, which is what I'd prefer for day-to-day reading.


It's quite thin. It has hooks that secure the Kindle. Like your cover, you can hold it in two hands or folded back on itself.
link
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1724 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 566 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 1230 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1575 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 1051 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 1291 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 1002 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 1117 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 979 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1390 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 524 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 529 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 968 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 529 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 978 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 972 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 910 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1385 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 1166 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 1187 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 1046 Views
True, I do remember liking the cover. It's much nicer than what comes with the Sony. - 01/02/2010 09:02:56 PM 1207 Views
This is what I have. It sounds like what you have for your Sony. - 01/02/2010 09:39:02 PM 1243 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1373 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 1055 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 1129 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 566 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 489 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 961 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 988 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 1193 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 952 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 1147 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 1053 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 457 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 963 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 985 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 1221 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 1031 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 1132 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 1197 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 994 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1373 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 1010 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 1046 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 1087 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 1049 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 1118 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 1124 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 500 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 440 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 463 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 941 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 987 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 437 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 4816 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 1125 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 970 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 1079 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 908 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 922 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 1195 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 446 Views

Reply to Message