Active Users:275 Time:01/05/2026 04:14:37 PM
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM
But the more people buying e-books, the less people buying real books. Obviously not a 1-to-1 relationship, but still. And even if it all ends up in the same publishing company, it doesn't end up in the pockets of the same retailers, and it effects which medium that publisher will emphasize in the future.

It's a bit of an oversimplification to think that a hit against the e-book industry is automatically a plus for traditional books, but the two are competing mediums.


Many people like myself will be quite happy to do away with paper books. I hate lugging them around, especially while traveling. In today's compact and on the go" world they are a waste of space. To seek the destruction of an emerging market because you are nostalgic toward traditional paper books is asinine.
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1644 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 513 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 1160 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1479 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 980 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 1199 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 926 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 1046 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 915 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1306 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 478 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 485 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 892 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 478 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 910 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 897 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 833 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1315 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 1096 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 1114 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 978 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1303 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 971 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 1050 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 523 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 455 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 889 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 916 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 1114 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 879 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 1080 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 989 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 417 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 903 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 914 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 1156 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 957 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 1069 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 1125 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 931 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1292 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 939 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 959 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 1001 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 966 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 1045 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 1056 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 461 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 400 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 422 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 875 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 906 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 397 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 4205 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 1053 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 904 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 1005 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 849 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 852 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 1121 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 408 Views

Reply to Message