I think I would only get slightly more interest than if it were Akkadian grammar.
Tom Send a noteboard - 21/05/2010 08:13:24 PM
Come on, you want to learn about the ventive, bound forms of nouns vs. absolute and construct forms, the fucked up writing system (think in Sumerian, but pronounce it in Akkadian) and of course all the fun you can count on when studying any Semitic language in verbs (III-weak verbs, hollow verbs, I-aleph, I-nun and I-w verbs and all sorts of other fun fun fun!).
I realized at about Lesson 12 in the Akkadian book that it is by far the hardest Semitic language to learn. You basically have to know a decent amount of Sumerian to read and write it, you need to memorize about 150-300 of the more common signs (there are up to around 600, but half of those are just names of particular cities, etc.), and you have a more complex grammar than in Hebrew or Arabic (or Aramaic, but that goes without saying). I had to STOP at Lesson 12, fully learn the writing system (Neo-Assyrian forms; the Old Babylonian lapidary forms are the sort of thing that can be learned incrementally) then go back. Then, around Lesson 20, I had to go back and brush up on my Sumerian (and those Old Babylonian lapidary forms came in handy). Once I finish the whole textbook (38 lessons) I will be able to read most anything in Sumerian or Akkadian, which, combined with Biblical Hebrew, Aramaic (including Syriac), Egyptian (including Coptic) and classical languages will mean I've got the ancient world pretty well covered.
The question is, just what do I research once I'm done?
I realized at about Lesson 12 in the Akkadian book that it is by far the hardest Semitic language to learn. You basically have to know a decent amount of Sumerian to read and write it, you need to memorize about 150-300 of the more common signs (there are up to around 600, but half of those are just names of particular cities, etc.), and you have a more complex grammar than in Hebrew or Arabic (or Aramaic, but that goes without saying). I had to STOP at Lesson 12, fully learn the writing system (Neo-Assyrian forms; the Old Babylonian lapidary forms are the sort of thing that can be learned incrementally) then go back. Then, around Lesson 20, I had to go back and brush up on my Sumerian (and those Old Babylonian lapidary forms came in handy). Once I finish the whole textbook (38 lessons) I will be able to read most anything in Sumerian or Akkadian, which, combined with Biblical Hebrew, Aramaic (including Syriac), Egyptian (including Coptic) and classical languages will mean I've got the ancient world pretty well covered.
The question is, just what do I research once I'm done?
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
- 20/05/2010 04:16:29 PM
1220 Views
It isn't something I can recall really noticing
- 20/05/2010 04:22:42 PM
405 Views
You don't live in the United States of America.
- 20/05/2010 04:31:23 PM
392 Views
- 20/05/2010 04:31:23 PM
392 Views
Well yes but me was just feeling smug it doesn't seem as common over here
- 20/05/2010 05:12:41 PM
375 Views
- 20/05/2010 05:12:41 PM
375 Views
I think this is one of those things people do because they think it makes them sound smart.
- 20/05/2010 04:33:38 PM
429 Views
When in actuality it exposese their stupidity and ignorance. *NM*
- 20/05/2010 04:36:08 PM
205 Views
Like saying "octopi". <Shivers> *NM*
- 20/05/2010 11:56:27 PM
311 Views
Octopodes makes them sounds like aliens
- 21/05/2010 12:25:14 AM
510 Views
- 21/05/2010 12:25:14 AM
510 Views
THEY ARE VICIOUS CREATURES FROM THE DEEP. CUTTLEFISH HAVE W SHAPED PUPILS. *NM*
- 21/05/2010 07:00:41 AM
327 Views
Actually nothing like that
- 21/05/2010 04:49:43 PM
360 Views
As a Classicist I'm afraid I can't get past the misguided origins. *NM*
- 21/05/2010 10:08:34 PM
302 Views
I don't know how me feels about this.
- 20/05/2010 04:49:03 PM
404 Views
you know, considering my state was THE lowest in the country for education...
- 20/05/2010 05:04:42 PM
413 Views
That annoys me, too
- 20/05/2010 05:34:30 PM
539 Views
I think you're confusing it with phrase-final prepositions. *NM*
- 20/05/2010 11:57:30 PM
307 Views
No
- 21/05/2010 12:00:02 AM
357 Views
Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
- 21/05/2010 12:03:59 AM
600 Views
Re: Oh right, that two (pro)nouns linked by "and" have to be the same case.
- 21/05/2010 12:06:51 AM
599 Views
Er, no...
- 21/05/2010 12:19:31 AM
352 Views
Re: Er, no...
- 21/05/2010 12:22:32 AM
363 Views
It doesn't. The reason for that is exactly as Tom says: idiotic teachers. *NM*
- 21/05/2010 12:28:12 AM
290 Views
But that is what I said when you contradicted me! *NM*
- 21/05/2010 12:38:11 AM
293 Views
OK, I'm officially lost.
- 21/05/2010 12:44:28 AM
398 Views
Re: OK, I'm officially lost.
- 21/05/2010 12:49:59 AM
585 Views
Can you start right from the beginning?
- 21/05/2010 12:52:08 AM
366 Views
Re: Can you start right from the beginning?
- 21/05/2010 12:55:34 AM
386 Views
Coffee time is going to be appropriated by grammar discussion? Shall I bring a book?
*NM*
- 21/05/2010 10:12:48 AM
299 Views
*NM*
- 21/05/2010 10:12:48 AM
299 Views
Not entirely. We just need to get a hold of Pratchett's Unseen Academicals on the way.
- 21/05/2010 11:25:57 AM
346 Views
This whole thread is just an elaborate effort to provoke my complaints about terminal prepositions.
- 21/05/2010 02:58:05 PM
490 Views
Re: Inspired by Camilla's post: quit saying "between you and I" already
- 20/05/2010 07:28:16 PM
476 Views
It doesn't annoy me, but I do fine myself silently correcting it when I hear it.
- 20/05/2010 07:44:49 PM
412 Views
It's the same as "I" vs. "me". "Who" can only be a subject. "Whom" is correct everywhere else.
- 20/05/2010 07:47:21 PM
597 Views
Well, shucks, Tom, we just ain't no good at that there grammer stuff.
- 20/05/2010 07:49:18 PM
384 Views
Not limited to the US of A.
- 20/05/2010 08:26:30 PM
569 Views
It's properly the "US and A" - if Borat taught me nothing else, it's that.
- 20/05/2010 08:46:18 PM
365 Views
If you're going to start down that path...
- 20/05/2010 10:12:24 PM
392 Views
- 20/05/2010 10:12:24 PM
392 Views
<Winces at your use of the word "ungrammatical"> *NM*
- 21/05/2010 12:09:29 AM
315 Views
I take it the wincing is at the concept, and not at the word itself...
- 21/05/2010 12:32:43 AM
583 Views
- 21/05/2010 12:32:43 AM
583 Views
It's the misappropriation of linguistic terminology to an improper use.
- 21/05/2010 12:44:54 AM
652 Views
I note you haven't replied to the main thread yet...
- 21/05/2010 01:12:05 AM
493 Views
Well of course that's wrong. It ought to be "The man whom you said that was coming."
*NM*
- 21/05/2010 07:03:37 AM
173 Views
*NM*
- 21/05/2010 07:03:37 AM
173 Views
OK, I know you're kidding around, but I can't tell if you know it isn't even prescriptively correct.
- 21/05/2010 10:38:51 AM
357 Views
I can't draw you a syntax tree or what have you to prove that it's wrong, no, but I know it is.
- 22/05/2010 02:56:52 AM
346 Views
- 22/05/2010 02:56:52 AM
346 Views
No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
- 22/05/2010 10:04:34 AM
530 Views
Clever clever. Explains why Greek changes the case in its indirect statements so much. *NM*
- 22/05/2010 09:47:26 PM
173 Views
Example please? *NM*
- 22/05/2010 10:34:05 PM
306 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
- 22/05/2010 11:40:05 PM
465 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
- 23/05/2010 10:30:59 AM
381 Views
Re: No trees necessary – this is lecture is 100% ecologically friendly.
- 23/05/2010 10:36:25 AM
500 Views
Cf pretty much every other European language, no?
- 23/05/2010 09:32:33 PM
349 Views
- 23/05/2010 09:32:33 PM
349 Views
Yes, but when you're a native speaker of English it comes as something of a surprise.
- 23/05/2010 11:18:45 PM
345 Views
The thing is that you really have to know Old English to figure it out.
- 24/05/2010 03:22:10 AM
356 Views
Actually, that would be a direct object
- 21/05/2010 01:11:42 AM
355 Views
*blinks* Now I'm confused.
- 21/05/2010 01:21:51 AM
341 Views
I know it's odd, but in terse responses, it seems to be a direct object rather than nominative
- 21/05/2010 01:46:10 AM
357 Views
No it isn't...in that case it would be "me", and not "a cookie", that is wanted.
- 21/05/2010 04:28:55 AM
362 Views
Well...
- 21/05/2010 04:33:27 AM
543 Views
"I want me a cookie" is not proper English.
- 21/05/2010 04:38:20 AM
550 Views
I know that
- 21/05/2010 05:31:52 AM
477 Views
See, this is an area where your dialect argument would make sense.
- 21/05/2010 11:53:17 AM
472 Views
But that doesn't actually make any sense in Latin.
- 22/05/2010 03:03:28 AM
358 Views
- 22/05/2010 03:03:28 AM
358 Views
I know it's dative in Latin
- 22/05/2010 03:14:48 AM
549 Views
Well, yes. But prepositions are how we decline our pronouns in English.
- 22/05/2010 04:35:42 AM
333 Views
- 22/05/2010 04:35:42 AM
333 Views
And you would be wrong in that.
- 22/05/2010 02:27:16 PM
357 Views
Iċ am not sure what þū said me is relevant these days...
- 22/05/2010 09:57:41 PM
332 Views
You still just aren't getting this.
- 23/05/2010 12:52:31 AM
352 Views
I accept it. But not in the circumstances when the prepositional phrase "to/for me" is used.
*NM*
- 23/05/2010 02:27:30 AM
175 Views
*NM*
- 23/05/2010 02:27:30 AM
175 Views
You're confusing me almost as much as Larry.
- 22/05/2010 11:15:43 AM
543 Views
- 22/05/2010 11:15:43 AM
543 Views
True. But English uses the reflexive in that scenario, not the personal pronoun.
- 22/05/2010 10:05:30 PM
374 Views
That was atrocious Latin.
- 22/05/2010 02:20:35 PM
570 Views
I was very drunk, and it wasn't that bad even had I been sober.
- 22/05/2010 10:04:12 PM
461 Views
Parare means, first and foremost, to prepare, supply or make something available.
- 23/05/2010 12:50:22 AM
468 Views
It also means to buy, and it frequently has that meaning when it's with the dative. No dice.
- 23/05/2010 02:31:01 AM
610 Views
Now you're pulling things out of your ass (about parare, at least)
- 23/05/2010 02:32:58 AM
341 Views
I unfortunately don't have the OLD, and no, I'm not.
- 23/05/2010 02:41:22 AM
381 Views
- 23/05/2010 02:41:22 AM
381 Views
So I looked up the word in Lewis & Short.
- 23/05/2010 02:49:19 AM
340 Views
Interestingly enough, the Oxford Latin Dictionary doesn't have one use of the dative for "to buy".
- 23/05/2010 02:51:54 PM
556 Views
When asked who told him that killing was wrong, Johnny Five said "I told me."
- 21/05/2010 09:52:15 PM
370 Views
One additional thought.
- 22/05/2010 02:14:15 AM
494 Views
in my elementary school grammar classes...
- 21/05/2010 04:44:50 AM
391 Views
You clearly had an unusually good teacher. That's exactly what should be taught.
- 21/05/2010 12:00:58 PM
357 Views
Seriously dudes? 70 posts about fricking grammar?!
- 21/05/2010 06:46:58 PM
376 Views
I'm proud of us all. If it were about Akkadian grammar, I'd be even more proud. *NM*
- 21/05/2010 06:51:20 PM
279 Views
You could make it about Russian grammar
- 21/05/2010 07:05:35 PM
469 Views
I think I would only get slightly more interest than if it were Akkadian grammar.
- 21/05/2010 08:13:24 PM
505 Views
True
- 21/05/2010 08:45:54 PM
338 Views
Ah, you misunderstood my question.
- 21/05/2010 09:10:56 PM
555 Views
I guess I did
- 21/05/2010 09:25:53 PM
617 Views
- 21/05/2010 09:25:53 PM
617 Views

*NM*
*NM*