Active Users:185 Time:18/05/2024 06:38:00 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
i once pointed out to a guy i was in school with about how every time particle physicists can't quite explain something, they decide it must be done by an as-yet-to-be-discovered particle. he said there have been a few of those that were right so the theory must be working but i always found it to be kind of a cop-out. yeah, the math describes *something* but i can't believe that every damn thing has to have a particle (or multiple particles) attached to it. meh, if they find all 5 particles i'll be supremely impressed with them. but i'm sure they'll get close to finding one or two then decide that there are a few more particles that describe the particles they haven't found yet :rolleyes:

It worked the first couple times, so it became a panacea. If the detectors aren't finding it, we need a bigger detector; it doesn't prove the thing doesn't exist, because you can't prove a negative. But we know it's there because the theory requires it; you just have to have fai--oh crap, this may not be science any more.... :P

You have to admit, the "God particle" is aptly named. ;)
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' everynametaken - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 697 Views
Gher - 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 341 Views
I minored in modern physics, which means, I have enough knowledge to be..... trzaska2000 - 15/06/2010 04:45:35 AM 330 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... moondog - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 351 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! Ghavrel - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 341 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. Joel - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 293 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. Dreaded Anomaly - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 315 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff Isaac - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 320 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! Joel - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 317 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite Isaac - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 308 Views
When giant radiating dike swarms get hot they produce dickite? Joel - 16/06/2010 12:35:53 AM 336 Views
This I can believe. Joel - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 260 Views
It's more than a few right answers. Dreaded Anomaly - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 438 Views
did you go to school in wisconsin? cause you sound just like that guy moondog - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM 297 Views
Yet, when determining the measure for what a planet is, Pluto vanished from the list! Birdeye - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM 328 Views
right, but it's still out there in the same orbit with the same momentum and positioning moondog - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM 418 Views
It had to lose its status or you'd have to memorize several more planets Isaac - 15/06/2010 08:57:20 AM 353 Views
y'all are screwing up my "uncertainty principle" joke dammit! *NM* moondog - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM 136 Views
Sorry Totally missed it *NM* Isaac - 15/06/2010 09:45:23 AM 185 Views
I was disappointed they didn't make all the dwarf planets into planet planets. Darth_Katie - 16/06/2010 01:00:51 PM 347 Views
As a physicist... Dreaded Anomaly - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 437 Views
Cool. Darth_Katie - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 356 Views
I feel ya! *NM* everynametaken - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 206 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. jiggy - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 437 Views
Not quite. Dreaded Anomaly - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 423 Views
Re: Not quite. jiggy - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 434 Views
Nerds! everynametaken - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 260 Views
Re: Not quite. Dreaded Anomaly - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 490 Views
Re: Not quite. jiggy - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 415 Views
Eight minus three is five Floffe - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 237 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes