Active Users:192 Time:18/05/2024 06:00:35 PM
As a physicist... Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM
The new CP violation result itself is still questionable; the rule of thumb is that 5-sigma evidence is needed for firm confirmation, and this is only 3-sigma. Plus, CDF doesn't see it at all, although (as mentioned in the paper) CDF's result comes from much less data than DZero's.

The suggestion that two Higgs doublets would account for this interaction seems to have some theoretical merit, although it depends on several other assumptions about the nature of supersymmetry.

Here's a link to their actual paper:
CP violation in B_s mixing from heavy Higgs exchange
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 697 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 341 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 351 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 341 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 292 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 314 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 320 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 317 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 308 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 260 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 438 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 437 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 356 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 206 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 437 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 423 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 433 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 260 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 490 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 415 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 237 Views

Reply to Message